strategy and business plans. This leadership structure has resulted in the continued excellent growth and long-term financial success of the company.
The Company has adopted policies to ensure a strong and independent board. The Board regularly meets in executive session without the presence of management. Board members rotate the chairmanship of these sessions. The Board has not designated a lead independent director.director, but it plans to appoint a lead director by the end of 2011. Seventy-five percent of the Company’s directors are independent as defined under NASDAQ regulations.
The Board oversees risk through management presentations at Board meetings and through its Audit Committee.and Compensation Committees. The Audit Committee charter provides that the Committee shall discuss with management the Company’s risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures. As part of this process, the Committee receives periodic reports from the Company’s internal auditor and from its general counsel and the committee reports to the full Board at least twice a year. The Compensation Committee oversees risk arising from the Company’s compensation programs and annually reviews how those programs manage and mitigate risk.
Stockholders may contact the Board of Directors by writing to: The Board of Directors, PACCAR Inc, 11th Floor, P.O. Box 1518, Bellevue, WA 98009, or bye-mailingPACCAR.Board@paccar.com. The Corporate Secretary will receive, process and acknowledge receipt of all written stockholder communications. Suggestions or concerns involving accounting, internal controls or auditing matters will be directed to the Audit Committee chairman. Concerns regarding other matters will be directed to the individual director or committee named in the correspondence. If no identification is made, the matter will be directed to the Executive Committee of the Board.
The Board of Directors met four times during 2009.2010. Each member attended at least 75 percent of the combined total of meetings of the Board of Directors and the committees of the Board on which each served. All Company directors are expected to attend each annual stockholder meeting. All directors attended the annual stockholder meeting in April 2009 except Ms. Carnwath and Messrs. Hachigian and Williamson.2010.
7
The Board has four standing committees. The members of each committee are listed below with the chairman of each committee listed first:
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Nominating and
|
Audit
| | Compensation
| | Executive
| | GovernanceNominating and
|
Committee | | Compensation Committee | | Committee | | Governance Committee |
|
S. F. Page | | C. R. Williamson | | M. C. Pigott | | J. M. Fluke, Jr. |
J. M. Fluke, Jr. | | A. J. Carnwath | | J. M. Fluke, Jr. | | A. J. Carnwath |
P.R. T. Parry | | K. S. Hachigian | | W. G. Reed, Jr. | | S. F. Page |
W. R. Reed, Jr. | | G. M. E. Spierkel | | | | W. R. Staley |
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee has responsibility for the selection, evaluation and compensation of the independent auditors and approval of all services they provide. The Committee reviews the Company’s annual and quarterly financial statements, monitors the integrity and effectiveness of the audit process, and reviews the corporate compliance programs. It monitors the Company’s system of internal controls over financial reporting and oversees the internal audit function.
The Audit Committee charter describes the Committee’s responsibilities. It is posted atwww.paccar.com/company/corporateresponsibility/auditcommittee.aspauditcommittee.asp.. All four members of the Audit Committee meet the independence and financial literacy requirements of the SEC and NASDAQ rules. The
8
Board of Directors designated independent directors S. F. Page and J. M. Fluke, Jr., as Audit Committee financial experts. The Committee met six times in 2009.2010.
Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee has responsibility for reviewing and approving salaries and other compensation matters for executive officers. It administers the LTIP, the Senior Executive Yearly Incentive Compensation Plan and the DC Plan. The Committee establishes base salaries, and annual and long-term performance goals for executive officers. It considers the opinion of the CEO when determining compensation for the executives that report to him. It also evaluates the CEO’s performance annually in executive session. It approves the attainment of annual and long-term goals by the executive officers.
The Committee has authority to employ a compensation consultant to assist in the evaluation of the compensation of the Company’s CEO or other executive officers. The Committee does not retain a compensation consultant on an annual basisbasis. In 2010, the Committee retained Mercer to conduct a competitive market review based on aggregated survey data from the durable goods manufacturing industry for which it was paid $19,251. Mercer reported the results to the Committee but provided no advice or recommendations. Mercer and its affiliates were retained by Company management to provide services unrelated to executive compensation, including insurance brokerage and benefit plan services. The aggregate fees paid for those other services in fiscal 2010 were $175,079. The Committee did not retain onereview or approve the other services provided by Mercer and its affiliates to the Company, as those services were approved by management in 2009. the normal course of business.
The Compensation Committee charter describes the Committee’s responsibilities. It is posted atwww.paccar.com/company/corporateresponsibility/compensationcommittee.aspcompensationcommittee.asp.. All four members of the Compensation Committee meet the director independence requirements of the NASDAQ rules and the “outside director” requirements of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Committee met sixfive times in 2009.2010.
Nominating and Governance Committee
The Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for evaluating director candidates and selecting nominees for approval by the independent members of the Board of Directors. It also makes recommendations to the Board on corporate governance matters including director compensation.
The Committee has established written criteria for the selection of new directors, which are available atwww.paccar.com/company/corporateresponsibility/boardguidelines.aspboardguidelines.asp.. The criteria state that a diversity of perspectives, skills and business experience relevant to the Company’s global operations should be represented on the Board including international business, manufacturing, financial services and aftermarket customer programs. To be a qualified director candidate, a person must have achieved significant success in business, education or public service, must not have a conflict of interest and must be committed to representing the long-term interests of the stockholders. In addition, the candidate must have the following attributes:
| | |
| • | the highest ethical and moral standards and integrity; |
|
| • | the intelligence, education and experience to make a meaningful contribution to board deliberations; |
|
| • | the commitment, time and diligence to effectively discharge board responsibilities; |
8
| | |
| • | mature judgment, objectivity, practicality and a willingness to ask difficult questions; and |
|
| • | the commitment to work together as an effective group member to deliberate and reach consensus for the betterment of the stockholders and the long-term viability of the Company. |
The Committee considers the names of director candidates submitted by management and members of the Board of Directors. It also considers recommendations by stockholders submitted in writing to: Chairman, Nominating and Governance Committee, PACCAR Inc, 11th Floor, P.O. Box 1518, Bellevue, WA 98009. Nominations by stockholders must include information set forth in the Company Bylaws. The Committee
9
engages the services of a private search firm from time to time to assist in identifying and screening director candidates. The Committee evaluates qualified director candidates and selects nominees for approval by the independent members of the Board of Directors. Mr. John M. PigottKirk S. Hachigian, a director and Mr. Gregory M. E. Spierkel are directors and nomineesnominee who havehas not previously stood for election. Mr. Pigottelection, was recommended to the Committee by a non-management director and the Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Spierkel was recommendedpresented to the Committee by a third-party search firm.
The Nominating and Governance Committee charter describes the Committee’s responsibilities. It is posted atwww.paccar.com/company/corporateresponsibility/nominatingcommittee.aspnominatingcommittee.asp.. Each of the four Committee members meets the independence requirements of the NASDAQ rules. The Committee met three times in 2009.2010.
Executive Committee
The Executive Committee acts on routine Board matters when the Board is not in session. The Committee took action once in 2009.2010.
9
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS
The following table provides information on compensation for non-employee directors who served during the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009:2010:
Summary Compensation
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | All
| | | | | | | | All
| | |
| | Fees Earned or
| | Stock
| | Other
| | | | Fees Earned or
| | Stock
| | Other
| | |
| | Paid in Cash (a)
| | Awards (b)
| | Compensation (c)
| | Total (d)
| | Paid in Cash (a)
| | Awards (b)
| | Compensation (c)
| | Total (d)
|
Name | | ($) | | ($) | | ($) | | ($) | | ($) | | ($) | | ($) | | ($) |
|
A. J. Carnwath | | | 115,000 | | | | 90,015 | | | | | | | | 205,015 | | | | 125,000 | | | | 90,024 | | | | | | | | 215,024 | |
J. M. Fluke, Jr. | | | 120,000 | | | | 90,015 | | | | | | | | 210,015 | | | | 125,000 | | | | 90,024 | | | | | | | | 215,024 | |
K. S. Hachigian | | | 107,500 | | | | 90,015 | | | | | | | | 197,515 | | | | 112,500 | | | | 90,024 | | | | | | | | 202,524 | |
S. F. Page | | | 120,000 | | | | 90,015 | | | | | | | | 210,015 | | | | 125,000 | | | | 90,024 | | | | 5,000 | | | | 220,024 | |
R. T. Parry | | | 110,000 | | | | 90,015 | | | | 5,000 | | | | 205,015 | | | | 115,000 | | | | 90,024 | | | | 5,000 | | | | 210,024 | |
J. C. Pigott | | | 24,313 | | | | 90,015 | | | | | | | | 114,328 | | |
J. M. Pigott | | | 80,687 | | | | 67,500 | | | | | | | | 148,187 | | | | 105,000 | | | | 90,024 | | | | 5,000 | | | | 200,024 | |
W. G. Reed, Jr. | | | 115,000 | | | | 90,015 | | | | | | | | 205,015 | | | | 115,000 | | | | 90,024 | | | | | | | | 205,024 | |
G. M. E. Spierkel | | | 115,000 | | | | 90,015 | | | | | | | | 205,015 | | | | 125,000 | | | | 90,024 | | | | | | | | 215,024 | |
W. R. Staley | | | 115,000 | | | | 90,015 | | | | 5,000 | | | | 210,015 | | | | 120,000 | | | | 90,024 | | | | 5,000 | | | | 215,024 | |
C. R. Williamson | | | 120,000 | | | | 90,015 | | | | | | | | 210,015 | | | | 125,000 | | | | 90,024 | | | | | | | | 215,024 | |
| | |
(a) | | Fees for non-employee directors include the 20092010 annual retainer of $75,000, paid quarterly, board meeting fees of $7,500 per meeting and committee meeting fees of $5,000 per meeting. If elected or retired during the calendar year, the non-employee director receives a prorated retainer. A single meeting attendance fee is paid when a board and committee meeting are held on the same day. S. F. Page and C. R. Williamson elected to defer retainer and meeting fees into stock units pursuant to the terms of the RSDC Plan described in the Narrative below. |
|
(b) | | The aggregate grant date fair value of the restricted stock award granted on January 2, 2009,3, 2010, to non-employee directors was $90,000. The award for J. M. Pigott was prorated as of April 27, 2009. All outstanding restricted stock awards for J. C. Pigott vested on his retirement in April 2009.$90,024. See Note RQ to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.2010. On December 31, 2009,2010, non-employee directors held the following unvested shares of restricted stock or restricted stock units: A. J. Carnwath 6,694;7,073; J. M. Fluke, Jr., 6,694;7,073; K. S. Hachigian 3,656;6,115; S. F. Page 6,694;7,073; R. T. Parry 6,694;7,073; J. M. Pigott 1,976; W. G. Reed, Jr., 6,694;7,073; G. M. E. Spierkel 4,360;6,819; W. R. Staley 3,656;6,115; C. R. Williamson 6,694.Williamson7,073. |
|
(c) | | Directors may participate in the Company’s matching gift program on the same basis as U.S. salaried employees. Under the program, the PACCAR Foundation matches donations participants make to eligible educational institutions up to a maximum annual donation of $5,000 per participant. |
10
| | |
(d) | | K. S. Hachigian, S. F. Page, R. T. Parry, J. M. Pigott, G. M. E. Spierkel and C. R. Williamson deferred some or all of their compensation earned in 2009.2010. None of the deferred compensation earned interest that was in excess of 120 percent of the applicable federal long-term rate as prescribed under Section 1274(d) of the Internal Revenue Code. Perquisites were less than the $10,000 reporting threshold. |
Narrative to Director Compensation Table
On the first business day of the year, each non-employee director receives $90,000 in restricted stock or restricted stock units under the RSDC Plan. The number of shares received is determined by dividing $90,000 by the closing price of a share of Company stock on the first business day of the year.year and rounding up to the nearest whole share. Non-employee directors
10
elected during the calendar year receive a prorated award to reflect the number of calendar quarters the director will serve in the year of election. Restricted shares vest three years after the date of grant or upon mandatory retirement after age 72, death or disability. Directors receive dividends and voting rights on all shares during the vesting period. Effective January 1, 2008, the RSDC Plan was amended to allow non-employee directors to elect to receive a credit to the stock unit account in lieu of a grant of restricted stock. The account is credited with the number of shares otherwise applicable to the grant of restricted stock and subject to the same vesting conditions. Thereafter dividends earned are treated as if they were reinvested at the closing price of Company stock on the date the dividend is payable.
Non-employee directors may elect to defer all or a part of their cash retainer and fees to an income account or to a stock unit account under the RSDC Plan. The income account accrues interest at a rate equal to the simple combined average of the monthly Aa Industrial Bond yield averages for the immediately preceding quarter and is compounded quarterly. Stock unit accounts are credited with the number of shares of Company common stock that could have been purchased at the closing price on the date the cash compensation is payable. Thereafter dividends earned are treated as if they were reinvested at the closing price of Company stock on the date the dividend is payable. The balances in a director’s deferred accounts are paid out at or after retirement or termination in accordance with the director’s deferred account election. The balance in the stock unit account is distributed in shares of the Company’s common stock.
The Company provides transportation for or reimburses non-employee directors for travel andout-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with their services. It also pays or reimburses directors for expenses incurred to participate in continuing education programs.
Stock Ownership Guidelines for Non-Employee Directors
All non-employee directors are expected to hold at least $200,000 worth of Company stockand/or deferred stock units while serving as a director. Directors have three years from date of appointment to attain this ownership threshold. All non-employee directors with three or more years of service are in compliance as of January 1, 2010.2011.
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS
Under its Charter, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors is responsible for reviewing and approving related-person transactions as set forth in Item 404 of the Securities and Exchange CommissionRegulation S-K. The Committee will consider whether such transactions are in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. The Company has written procedures designed to bring such transactions to the attention of management. Management is responsible for presenting related-person transactions to the Audit Committee for review and approval.
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires the Company’s directors and executive officers to report to the SEC on a timely basis their ownership of Company stock and any changes in such ownership. The Company believes that all of its directors and executive officers complied with all reporting requirements of Section 16(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act on a timely basis during 20092010 except thatone transaction consisting of a timelygift of shares from M. C. Pigott to his children was filed report for R. E. Armstrong had a clerical error in the number of stock options grantedlate and was corrected.reported on a Form 4 in 2011.
11
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CD&A)
Compensation Program Objectives and Structure
PACCAR’s compensation programs are designed to attract and retain high-quality executives, link incentives to the Company’s superior performance and align the interests of management with those of stockholders. These programs offer compensation that is competitive with companies that operate in the same industries globally. PACCAR’s goal is to achieve superior performance measured against its industry peers. Under the supervision of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”), composed exclusively of independent directors, the Company compensation objectives utilize programs that have delivered 7172 consecutive years of net income, yearlyannual dividends since 1941 and excellent stockholder returns. The Company has significantly outperformed the S&P 500 index for the ten-year period ending December 31, 2010. The Company has delivered an annualized total return to stockholders of 23.0 percent versus the S&P 500 1.4 percent return in the last decade. For 2010, PACCAR shareholders received a return of over 60 percent. The compensation framework has these components:
Short-term performance compensation:
| | |
| • | Salary. The fixed amount of compensation for performingday-to-day responsibilities. |
| • | Annual incentive cash compensation. Annual cash awards that focus on the attainment of Company yearly profitability and individual business unit goals. |
Long-term performance compensation:
| | |
| • | An equity-andequity- and cash-based Long Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) that focuses on long-term growth in stockholder value, including three-year performance versus industry peers as measured by growth in net income, return on sales and return on capital. The equity-based compensation consists of stock options and restricted stock. |
The Committee believes that this combination of salary, cash incentives and equity-based compensation provides appropriate incentives for executives to deliver superior short-andshort- and long-term business performance and stockholder returns.
The Named Executive Officers and all U.S. salaried employees participate in the Company’s retirement programs. The Named Executive Officers also participate in the Company’s unfunded Supplemental Retirement Plan described on page 25, which provides a retirement benefit to those employees affected by the maximum benefit limitations permitted for qualified plans by the Internal Revenue Code and other qualified plan benefit limitations. The Company does not provide any other significant perquisites or executive benefits to its Named Executive Officers.
Executive Compensation Criteria
The Compensation Committee considers a number of important factors when reviewing and determining executive compensation, including Company performance, business unit performance, individual performance and compensation for executives among peer organizations. The Committee also considers the opinion of the Chief Executive Officer when determining compensation for the executives that report to him.
Role of Compensation Consultant. The Committee does not retain a compensation consultant on an annual basis and it did not retain one in 2009.
Industry Compensation Comparison Groups. The Compensation Committee periodically utilizes information from industry-published compensation surveys as well as compensation data from peer companies to determine if compensation for the Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers is competitive with the market. The Committee believes that comparative compensation information should be used in its deliberations. It does not specify a “target” compensation level for any given executive but rather a range of target compensation. The Committee has discretion to determine the nature and extent to which it will use comparative compensation data.
12
Role of Compensation Consultant. The Committee does not retain a compensation consultant on an annual basis. In 2010, the Committee retained Mercer to conduct a competitive market review for the Company’s Named Executive Officers. The Committee asked Mercer to analyze the competitiveness of all elements of compensation, including base salary, short- and long-term cash incentives and equity compensation, and to rely upon available and published management compensation survey data from the durable goods manufacturing industry. Mercer analyzed a 2009 Mercer Report (139 companies) and a2009-2010 Towers Watson report (578 companies) and provided the Committee only with aggregated data obtained from the surveyed companies. PACCAR Named Executive Officer compensation was compared to positions at surveyed companies with similar duties and revenue responsibilities. Overall, the market review found that target total direct compensation (total cash and equity) for the Named Executive Officers was between the market 25th percentile and the median. Target annual incentives were below market median by between 10 and 54 percent of base salary. Mercer reported its findings to the Committee, but it did not make any recommendations or provide any advice based on its review. The Committee reviewed the study and approved an increase to the percent of base salary used to determine target annual incentive compensation opportunities, effective January 1, 2011, as described on page 18.
Peer Companies. As part of its analysis of comparative data, the Committee includes compensation data from Peer Companies. In particular, the Company measures its financial performance against Peer Companies when evaluating achievement of the cash portion of the LTIP Company performance goal and applicable goals under the restricted stock share match program. The nine Peer Companies for the LTIP2007-2009 cycle are:
| | | | |
• ArvinMeritor Inc. | | • Caterpillar Inc. | | • Cummins Inc. |
• Dana Corporation | | • Deere & Company | | • Eaton Corporation |
• Ingersoll-Rand Company Ltd. | | • Navistar International Corporation | | • Oshkosh Truck Corporation |
As discussed in the 2008 proxy statement, effective with the LTIP2008-2010 cycle, the following are the Peer Companies for purposes of the Company performance goal in the LTIP cash program and the applicable goals under the share match program. These companies also comprise the index used in the stock performance graph set forth in the Company’s Annual Report onForm 10-K and page 3139 of this proxy statement. The Committee reviews the composition of the Peer Companies annually to ensure the companies are appropriate for comparative purposes. It revised the Peer Companies for the2011-2013 LTIP cycle as described on page 18 to better reflect the cyclicality of the commercial vehicle industry. The eleven Peer Companies for the three-year LTIP cycles beginning in 2008, 2009 and 2010 are:
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2009 Revenue
| | 2010 Revenue
| |
Company Name | | (in billions) | | (in billions) | |
|
Caterpillar Inc. | | $ | 32.396 | | | $ | 42.588 | |
Cummins Inc. | | | 10.800 | | | | 13.226 | |
Danaher Corp. | | | 11.185 | | |
Danaher Corporation | | | | 13.203 | |
Deere & Company | | | 22.598 | | | | 25.398 | |
Dover Corp. | | | 5.776 | | |
Dover Corporation | | | | 7.133 | |
Eaton Corporation | | | 11.873 | | | | 13.715 | |
Harley-Davidson Inc. | | | 4.782 | | |
Harley-Davidson, Inc. | | | | 4.860 | |
Honeywell International Inc. | | | 30.908 | | | | 33.370 | |
Illinois Tool Works | | | 13.877 | | |
Ingersoll-Rand Company Ltd. | | | 13.195 | | |
United Technologies Corp. | | | 52.920 | | |
Illinois Tool Works Inc. | | | | 15.870 | |
Ingersoll-Rand PLC | | | | 14.079 | |
United Technologies Corporation | | | | 54.326 | |
PACCAR Inc | | | 8.087 | | | | 10.293 | |
Elements of Total Compensation
The Company’s executive compensation program is comprised of base salaries, annual cash incentives, and long-term incentives consisting of cash, stock options and restricted stock.
Compensation Mix. The Company’s executive compensation program structure includes a balance of annual and long-term incentives, cash and Company equity. At higher levels of responsibility within the Company, the senior executives have a larger percentage of total compensation at risk based on Company performance incentive programs. For 2009,2010, the Committee approved target allocations as displayed below. The Company believes these allocations promote its objectives of profitable growth and superior long-term results. M. A. Tembreull retired as Vice Chairman and principal financial officer on January 2, 2009. He is listed as a Named Executive Officer in this proxy statement, but his compensation is based on 2008 performance. He is not included in the analysis in the CD&A for 2009 compensation.
13
| | |
Chairman & CEO
| | Other Named Executive Officers
|
20092010 Target Compensation Structure | | 20092010 Average Target Compensation Structure |
Base Salary. Base salary provides a fixed, baseline level of compensation that is not contingent upon Company performance. It is important that base salaries are competitive with industry peer companies to attract and retain high-caliber executives. The midpoints of the base salary ranges are set at approximately the market median of the 2006 Hewitt survey, described on page 12 of the 2009 proxy statement, with minimums at 70 percent of the midpoint and maximums at 130 percent of the midpoint and themidpoint. The salary midpoints were not changed in 2009.2010. An executive officer’s actual salary relative to this salary range reflects his or her responsibility, experience and individual performance.
The Committee periodically reviews base salaries every 12 to 24 months and may or may not approve changes. Consistent with this practice, the Committee reviewed the salary of each Named Executive Officer in 2010. The Committee considered performance, the addition of new responsibilities and on January 1, 2009, R.the results of the Mercer compensation study in its review of salaries. The executive salaries had not been adjusted since 2008. The Committee approved the percent increase listed over the 2008 base salaries as follows: T. E. ArmstrongPlimpton received a 5.412.5 percent increase over his December 1, 2007 base salary. There were no base salary increases for any other Named Executive Officers in 2009.increase; J. G. Cardillo received an 8.0 percent increase; D. D. Sobic received a 3.3 percent increase; and R. J. Christensen received a 12.5 percent increase. The Chief Executive Officer suggested theall salary revisionrevisions for the Named Executive Officer. It was consistent with the Company’s overall compensation guidelines.Officers. The Committee believes that the base salary of each of the Named Executive Officers is appropriate based on scope of responsibility, tenure with the Company, individual performance and competitive pay practices.
Annual Incentive Cash Compensation (“IC”). This program provides yearly cash incentives for the Named Executive Officers to achieve annual Company profit and business unit goals. The Committee sets annual performance goals and a threshold, target and maximum award for each Named Executive Officer, expressed as a percentage of base salary. In 2009,2010, the Committee loweredrestored the maximum award achievable fromto 200 percent of target for 140 percent of goal achievement after a one-year reduction in 2009 to 160 percent of target for 130 percent goal achievement to reduce compensation expense. 2009achievement. 2010 Awards are measured on a sliding scale as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
% of Goal Achieved | | | <70 | % | | | 70 | % | | | 85 | % | | | 100 | % | | | 115 | % | | 130% and above | | | <70 | % | | | 70 | % | | | 85 | % | | | 100 | % | | | 115 | % | | | 130 | % | | 140% and above |
| | |
% of Target Paid | | | 0 | % | | | 40 | % | | | 70 | % | | | 100 | % | | | 130 | % | | 160% | | | 0 | % | | | 40 | % | | | 70 | % | | | 100 | % | | | 130 | % | | | 160 | % | | 200% |
A hallmark of the annual cash incentive program has been a consistent and rigorous focus on achieving the Company’s annual net profit goal. The Committee has chosen net profit, not EBITDA or operating profit, as the chief financial metric for this program because it is the primary indicator of corporate performance to stockholders. When setting incentive compensation goals for the Named Executive Officers, the Committee believes that corporate performance is an appropriate measure of individual performance. Accordingly, the
14
20092010 goal for four of the Named Executive Officers is based entirely upon Company performance relative to an overall net profit goal proposed by Company management and approved by the Committee within the first 90 days of each year. The target level represents an amount of net profit that the Committee determines is attainable with outstanding performance under expected economic conditions. The Committee assesses annual goal achievement and approves awards for the Named Executive Officers.
IC Awards for the Named Executive Officers are subject to the terms of the Senior Executive Yearly Incentive Compensation Plan (the “IC Plan”) approved by the stockholders as required by Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. The maximum amount that may be paid to any eligible participant in any year under the Plan is $4,000,000. The Committee, in its sole discretion, may reduce or eliminate (but not increase) any award earned by the Named Executive Officers based on an assessment of individual performance.
For 2009,2010, the Company’s net profit target was $300$125 million and actual net profit was $111.9$457.6 million, an excellent result considering the difficult recession. However,global recession in the transportation industry. The Committee approved award payments of 200 percent of the target award, which corresponds with achievement of 140 percent of the net profit was less than the threshold requiredgoal for each Named Executive Officer. The Committee approved an award so noneoverall payment for R. J. Christensen of 185 percent of target consisting of 140 percent achievement of the Named Executive Officers received payment on the Companydivisional net profit goal. The Committee concluded that R. E. Armstrong did not meet the thresholdgoal and 125 percent achievement for division profit but he exceeded the business leadership goal of improving the Company’s financial liquidity, reaffirmation of the Company’s credit rating and issuance of term debt and approved a payout of 32 percent of the overall target.increasing business in South America. The Committee did not exercise discretion to make modifications to any award. The following table outlines the 20092010 goals and incentive awards for each Named Executive Officer.Officer:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Target Award
| | | | Award
| | | | | Target Award
| | | | Award
|
| | Financial
| | as a % of
| | | | Achieved as
| | | Financial
| | as a % of
| | | | Achieved as
|
| | Performance
| | Base
| | Performance Measure
| | a % of
| | | Performance
| | Base
| | Performance Measure
| | a % of
|
Name and Principal Position | | Measure | | Salary | | as a % of Target | | Target | | | Measure | | Salary | | as a % of Target | | Target |
|
M. C. Pigott | | Company Profit Goal | | | 100 | | | | 100 | | | | 0 | | | Company Profit Goal | | | 100 | | | | 100 | | | | 200 | % |
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
T. E. Plimpton | | Company Profit Goal | | | 75 | | | | 100 | | | | 0 | | | Company Profit Goal | | | 75 | | | | 100 | | | | 200 | % |
Vice Chairman | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
J. G. Cardillo | | Company Profit Goal | | | 70 | | | | 100 | | | | 0 | | | Company Profit Goal | | | 70 | | | | 100 | | | | 200 | % |
President | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
D. D. Sobic | | Company Profit Goal | | | 60 | | | | 100 | | | | 0 | | | Company Profit Goal | | | 60 | | | | 100 | | | | 200 | % |
Executive Vice President | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
R. E. Armstrong | | Company Profit Goal | | | 55 | | | | 50 | | | | 32 | | |
Senior Vice President | | Division Profit Goal | | | | | | | 30 | | | | | | |
R. J. Christensen | | | Company Profit Goal | | | 60 | | | | 40 | | | | 185 | % |
Executive Vice President | | | Division Profit Goal | | | | | | | 30 | | | | | |
| | Business Leadership | | | | | | | 20 | | | | | | | Business Leadership | | | | | | | 30 | | | | | |
Long-Term Incentive Compensation (LTIP). The Company’s long-term incentive program is based on a multi-year performance period and provides annual grants of stock options, restricted stock and cash incentive awards. The LTIP aligns the interests of stockholders with those of executives to focus on long-term growth in stockholder value. In late 2008, the Committee anticipated that difficult economic conditions would prevail through 2009. The Committee reduced the Company’s compensation expense by lowering the potential LTIP payout. This was achieved by restricting the target grant levels for the2009-2011 LTIP cycle to the percentage of base salary used for the 2005-2007 LTIP cycle and it also suspended the restricted stock program for 2009. The 20092010 target for each element of the long-term compensation program for each Named Executive Officer is calculated as a percentage of base salary as indicated in the table below.below:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Long-Term
| | Stock
| | Restricted
| | | | Stock
| | |
Name | | Cash | | Options | | Stock | | Long-Term Cash | | Options | | Restricted Stock |
|
M. C. Pigott | | | 60 | % | | | 450 | % | | | 0 | % | | | 150 | % | | | 375 | % | | | 150 | % |
T. E. Plimpton | | | 50 | % | | | 325 | % | | | 0 | % | | | 100 | % | | | 375 | % | | | 60 | % |
J. G. Cardillo | | | 45 | % | | | 325 | % | | | 0 | % | | | 90 | % | | | 300 | % | | | 60 | % |
D. D. Sobic | | | 35 | % | | | 260 | % | | | 0 | % | | | 70 | % | | | 260 | % | | | 50 | % |
R. E. Armstrong | | | 30 | % | | | 225 | % | | | 0 | % | |
R. J. Christensen | | | | 60 | % | | | 210 | % | | | 40 | % |
15
Long-term incentive compensation cash award. This program focuses on long-term growth in stockholder value by providing an incentive for superior Company performance that is measured against Peer CompaniesCompanies’ performance over a three-year period. Company performance is measured by three-year compound growth in net income, return on sales and return on capital (weighted equally) as compared to the Peer Companies’Companies (“Company Performance Goal”). Named Executive Officers and all executive officers are eligible for a long-termlong-
15
term incentive cash award based upon three-year performance goals approved by the Committee with a new performance period beginning every calendar year.
For the2009-20112010-2012 cycle, the Committee approved the following goals:
| | | | | | |
| | Financial Performance and
| | |
| | Individual Performance
| | Performance
|
| | Individual Performance Measures for
| | Measure as a
|
Name | | LTIP 2009-20112010-2012 Cycle | | a % of Target |
|
M. C. Pigott | | | Company Performance Goal | | | 100 |
T. E. Plimpton | | | Company Performance Goal | | | 100 |
J. G. Cardillo | | | Company Performance Goal | | | 100 |
D. D. Sobic | | | Company Performance Goal | | | 50 |
| | | Business Unit Profit | | | 25 |
| | | Business Unit PerformanceLeadership | | | 25 |
R. E. ArmstrongJ. Christensen | | | Company Performance Goal | | | 50 |
| | | Business Unit Profit | | | 3025 |
| | | Business Unit PerformanceLeadership | | | 2025 |
The Committee believes that three-year compound growth in net income, return on sales and return on capital are excellent indicators of the Company’s performance against the Peer Companies. The Company has used this rigorous comparison goal for over ten years. During that period the Company has demonstrated extraordinary performance against the Peer Companies and provided superior returns to stockholders. The target amount will be earned if the Company’s financial performance ranks above at least half of the Peer Companies. The maximum cash award amount will be earned if the Company’s financial performance ranks above all of the Peer Companies. No award will be earned if the Company’s financial performance ranks in the bottom 25 percent of the Peer Companies.
The remaining portion of the award for certain of the Named Executive Officers is based upon individual business unit goals determined by the Chief Executive Officer similar to those described above for the annual incentive plan, measured over a three-year performance cycle. The Committee assesses goal achievement for the prior three-year period in the April following completion of the applicable cycle and approves awards for the Named Executive Officers at such time. Long-term incentive cash awards are measured on a sliding scale as indicated below:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
% of Goal Achieved | | | <75% | | | | 75% | | | | 100% | | | | 125% | | | 150% and above | | | <75% | | | | 75% | | | | 100% | | | | 125% | | | 150% and above |
| | |
% of Target Paid | | | 0% | | | | 50% | | | | 100% | | | | 150% | | | 200% | | | 0% | | | | 50% | | | | 100% | | | | 150% | | | 200% |
In April 2009,2010, the Committee determined cash awards for the three-year period2006-20082007-2009 ending December 31, 2008.2009. One hundred percent of the cash award for M. C. Pigott M. A. Tembreull and T. E. Plimpton was based on the Company Performance Goal. For the2006-20082007-2009 LTIP cycle, the Company achieved superior results and tied for secondwas third among all of Peer Companies that reported earnings. The Committee approved a payout of 177.8155.6 percent of target on the Company Performance Goal for each Named Executive Officer reflecting excellent goal achievement and it did not exercise discretion to reduce or modify payment. The remaining 50 percent of the award for J. G. Cardillo was based on business unit profit. Since less than 75performance. The Committee determined that J. G. Cardillo achieved 200 percent of that goal was achieved, no payout was approvedhis business unit performance objective, which resulted in an overall payout of 88.9177.8 percent of target. The remaining award for D. D. Sobic was based 3025 percent on business unit profit and 3025 percent on business unit performance. The Committee determined that D. D. Sobic met only the business
16
unit performance goal and approved an overall payout of 116.1117.8 percent of target. The remaining award for R. E. ArmstrongJ. Christensen was based 30 percent on business unit profit and 3040 percent on business unit performance. The Committee determined that R. E. ArmstrongJ. Christensen exceeded eachthe business unit performance goal and approved an overall payout of 161.1106.7 percent of target reflecting this achievement.target. The long-term cash awards for the2007-20092008-2010 LTIP cycle have not been determined as of the date of this proxy statement.statement because Peer Group comparison data was not available.
16
The maximum amount that may be paid to any eligible participant in any year under this program is $6,000,000. The award is also subject to the conditions of payment set forth in the Long Term Incentive Plan, as required by Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Committee, in its sole discretion, may reduce or eliminate (but not increase) any award earned by the Named Executive Officers based on an assessment of individual performance.
Stock options. The Committee includes stock options in its compensation program because stock options link the interests of executives directly with stockholders’ interests through increased individual stock ownership. Stock options are granted by the Committee once each year on a predetermined date after the fourth-quarter earnings release, and are not repriced. They become exercisable at the end of a three-year vesting period and expire ten years after the date of grant.
The Compensation Committee granted stock options on February 6, 2009.2, 2010. The number of options was determined by multiplying the executive’s base salary on February 6, 2009,2, 2010, by a target award percentage and dividing by the average closing price of the Company’s stock on the first five trading days of the year. The exercise price of stock options is the closing price of the Company’s stock on the date of grant, February 6, 2009.2, 2010. All stock options granted in 20092010 vest and become exercisable on January 1, 2012,2013, and remain exercisable until January 20192020 unless the participant’s employment terminates for reasons other than retirement at age 65, or the participant is demoted to an ineligible position. Vesting may be accelerated in the event of a change in control.
Annual restricted stock program. Performance-based restricted stock is included in the program because it provides an opportunity for executives to earn Company equity with performance-based compensation deductible under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Committee sets a Company performance goal during the first 90 days of the year and restricted stock grants are made in the following year if the Committee determines that the performance goal is achieved. The restricted stock vests 25 percent per year over a four-year period beginning in the year followingof the grant. Unvested shares are forfeited upon termination unless termination is by reason of death, disability or retirement on or after age 62. All shares vest immediately upon a change in control. Each Named Executive Officer has the same rights as all other stockholders to vote the shares and receive cash dividends.
TheAs reported in the 2010 proxy statement, the restricted stock program was suspended in 2009 to reduce compensation expense during the recession and the Named Executive Officers including M. A. Tembreull, received an award of performance-baseddid not receive restricted stock onawards in 2010. The Committee reinstated the program in 2010 for awards made in 2011. In February 6, 2009, after2011, the Committee determined that the Company exceeded the performance goal of four percent return on 2008 revenues. The Chief Executive Officer declined to accept hiswas achieved and approved restricted stock award in 2009. The number of restricted shares granted was determined by multiplying the executive’s annual base salary by a target award percentage and dividing by the average closing price of the Company’s stock for the first five trading days of 2009. All awards were consistent with the target award percentage and the Committee did not exercise discretion to make any material adjustments. Twenty-five percent of the shares vesteddescribed on January 1, 2010, and 25 percent of shares will vest on each successive January 1 through January 1, 2013. Mr. Tembreull’s award vested on the award date due to his retirement.page 15.
Compensation of the Chief Executive Officer
The Committee applies the same compensation philosophy, policies and comparative data analysis to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer as it applies to the other Named Executive Officers. The Chief Executive Officer is the only officer with overall responsibility for all corporate functions and, as a result, has a greater percentage of his total compensation based on the overall financial performance of the Company. Under his leadership, the Company has significantly outperformed both its Peer Companies and the S&P 500 index for the ten-year period ending December 31, 2009.2010. The Company has delivered an average annualannualized total return to stockholders of 19.123.0 percent versus the S&P 500 negative 1.01.4 percent return in the last decade.
17
The Chief Executive Officer has received no increase in base salary since January 1, 2008. He received no restricted stock award in 20092010 because the program was suspended and he declined thehis 2009 award of restricted stock award. The Committee reviewed his salary in 2010 and approved a 5.2 percent increase, effective January 1, 2011, which is consistent with a grant date fair value of $1,992,421.the Company’s overall compensation guidelines. The Company has a share match program that enables the Chief Executive Officer to purchase Company stock either by exercising stock options or through open market purchases. He may receive a matching award of restricted stock if rigorous performance goals are met. The program provides for a maximum of 562,500 restricted shares and an annual limit of 150,000 shares. Restricted match shares vest after five years if the Company’s earnings per share growth over the same five-year period meets or exceeds at least fifty percent of the Peer Companies. The Chief Executive Officer has the same rights as all other stockholders to vote the shares and receive cash
17
dividends. With certain exceptions, all restricted match shares will be forfeited if the performance threshold is not achieved or if the Chief Executive Officer terminates employment with the Company during the vesting period. If the purchased shares are sold before the vesting period, an equal number of restricted match shares will be forfeited. No matching shares were granted under this program in 2009.2010.
Deferral of Annual and Long-Term Performance Awards
The Committee administers a Deferred Compensation Plan described on page 26 which allows eligible employees to defer cash incentive awards into an income account or a stock unit account. Both accounts are unfunded and unsecured. This program provides tax and retirement planning benefits to participants and market-based returns on amounts deferred. Certain deferrals are subject to Internal Revenue Code Section 409A. Payouts from the income account are made in cash either in a lump sum or in a maximum of 15 annual installments in accordance with the executive’s payment election. Stock units credited under the Deferred Compensation Plan are disbursed in a one-time payment of Company shares. Participation in the DCDeferred Compensation Plan is voluntary.
Stock Ownership Guidelines
The Board of Directors approved stock ownership guidelines for the Company’s executive officers and directors to link their long-term economic interest directly to that of the Company stockholders. The Chief Executive Officer is expected to hold a minimum of five times his base salary in Company stockand/or deferred stock units. Other executive officers are expected to hold a minimum of one times their base salary in Company stock, vested stock optionsand/or deferred stock units. Executive officers have three years to attain this ownership threshold. All executive officers are in compliance as of January 1, 2010.2011.
Changes Approved for 20102011
The Committee reinstated certain programs for all participants which had been reduced or suspendedapproved the following changes in 2009 reflecting the improving economy2010 to be effective in 2010.2011:
| | |
| • | The Committee reviewed the Long Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) and the Senior Executive Yearly Incentive Compensation Plan (“SEI”) reflecting the requirement to obtain stockholder approval of each plan’s performance goals in 2011. The Committee approved the addition of two performance goals, return on revenue and return on net assets, and approved an increase in the maximum LTIP cash award that may be earned underfrom $6.0 million to $6.5 million and an increase in the 2010 annual incentiveSEI maximum cash compensation program is reinstatedaward from $4.0 to 200 percent of$4.5 million. The maximum cash awards had not been updated since 2006 and were adjusted to reflect inflation over the executive’s target award.five-year period. The plan changes are effective January 1, 2011 subject to stockholder approval as described further in this proxy statement. |
|
| • | The Committee reinstatedincreased the formula and percentage of base salary used to determine long-termannual incentive compensation target awards for the2010-2012 cycle to2011 for the 2008 level. The 2010 target for each elementmajority of the long-termemployees eligible for the program. This action was taken to better align PACCAR compensation programwith the market median based on the external study conducted by Mercer, which showed that PACCAR’s target annual incentive compensation was between 10 and 54 percent below the market median. The 2011 target for each Named Executive Officer, calculated as a percentage of base salary, is indicated in the following table.table: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2010-2012 Cycle |
| | Long-Term
| | Stock
| | Restricted
|
Name | | Cash | | Options | | Stock |
|
M. C. Pigott | | | 150 | % | | | 375 | % | | | 150 | % |
T. E. Plimpton | | | 100 | % | | | 375 | % | | | 60 | % |
J. G. Cardillo | | | 90 | % | | | 300 | % | | | 60 | % |
D. D. Sobic | | | 70 | % | | | 260 | % | | | 50 | % |
R. E. Armstrong | | | 60 | % | | | 210 | % | | | 40 | % |
Annual Incentive Compensation
| | | | | | | | |
| | Target Award as a % of Base Salary |
Name | | New | | Prior |
|
M. C. Pigott | | | 110 | | | | 100 | |
T. E. Plimpton | | | 90 | | | | 75 | |
D. D. Sobic | | | 65 | | | | 60 | |
R. J. Christensen | | | 65 | | | | 60 | |
18
| | |
| • | The Committee revisedapproved a revision to the vesting schedule for future annual restricted stock grants from five yearslist of Peer Companies used to four years. Ifmeasure financial performance when evaluating the performance goal is achieved, 25 percent of each executive’s award will vest on the first daycash portion of the following month rather thanLTIP as described on page 13. Companies were |
18
| | |
| | ranked on how closely they matched the first dayCompany on industrial and revenue comparability, return on sales and business cycle correlation. Seven of the following year.existing peers were removed because they did not meet one or more of the criteria and seven companies were added. Beginning with the2011-2013 LTIP cycle, the eleven Peer Companies will be: Agco Corporation, ArvinMeritor Inc., Caterpillar Inc, Cummins Inc, Dana Holding Corporation, Deere & Company, Eaton Corporation, Navistar International Corporation, Oshkosh Corporation, Scania AB and AB Volvo. |
Effect of Post-Termination Events
The Company has no written employment agreement with its Chief Executive Officer or with any Named Executive Officer. Executive compensation programs provide full benefits only if a Named Executive Officer remains with the Company until normal retirement at age 65. In 2009, M. A. TembreullJ. G. Cardillo retired at the end of 2010 at age 62 and forfeited unvested stock options and long-term incentive cash for the partially completed2007-20092009-2011 and2008-20102010-2012 cycles. All outstanding restricted stock awards vested on his retirement. In general, upon a termination without cause a Named Executive Officer retains vested benefits but receives no enhancements or severance. In a termination for cause, the executive forfeits all benefits except those provided under a qualified pension plan. Annual and long-term cash incentives are prorated upon retirement at age 65 or death and are awarded at the maximum level upon a change in control. The annual restricted stock grants become fully vested at retirement, death or a change in control. The Company believes that the benefits described in this section help it attract and retain its executive officers by providing financial security in the event of certain qualifying terminations of employment or a change of control of the Company. The fact that the Company provides these benefits does not materially affect other decisions that the Company makes regarding compensation. The Company maintains a separation pay plan for all U.S. salaried employees that providesprovide a single payment of up to six months of base salary in the event of job elimination in a business restructuring or reduction in the workforce. The Named Executive Officers are eligible for the benefit on the same terms as any other eligible U.S. salaried employee.
Effect of Accounting or Tax Treatment
Company policy is to structure compensation arrangements that preserve tax deductions for executive compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. Cash awards paid to Named Executive Officers under the IC Plan and under the LTIP are subject to certain conditions of payment intended to preserve deductibility imposed under Section 162(m). The Committee establishes a yearly funding plan limit equal to a percentage of the Company’s net income and assigns each Named Executive Officer a percentage of each fund. In 2009,2010, the funding limit for the Named Executive Officers under the IC Plan equaled twothree percent of the Company’s net income and the limit for the LTIP equaled three quarters of one percent of the Company’s cumulative net income for the2009-20112010-2012 performance cycle. The Committee can exercise discretion to reduce or eliminate any award earned by the Named Executive Officers based on an assessment of individual performance against preapproved goals. The cash incentive awards to the Named Executive Officers under both plans are subject to the pre-established funding and plan limits even if some or all of the executive’s performance goals have been exceeded. The Committee retains the flexibility to pay compensation that is not fully deductible within the limitations of Section 162(m) if it determines that such action is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders in order to attract, retain and reward outstanding executives. The Company offers compensation programs that are intended to be tax efficient for the Company and for the executive officers.
Conclusion
The Company’s compensation programs are designed and administered in a manner consistent with its executive compensation philosophy and guiding principles. The programs emphasize the retention of key executives and appropriate rewards for excellent results. The Committee monitors these programs in recognition of the dynamic marketplace in which the Company competes for talent. The Company will continue to emphasizepay-for-performance and equity-based incentive programs that compensate executives for results that are consistent with generating outstanding performance for its stockholders.
19
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
The Committee reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis Section (CD&A) for 20092010 with management. Based on the Committee’s review and its discussions with management, the Committee recommends to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis Section be included in the Company’s proxy statement for the 20102011 Annual Meeting.
THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
C. R. Williamson, Chairman
A. J. Carnwath
K. S. Hachigian
G. M. E. Spierkel
Summary Compensation
The following table provides information on compensation for the Named Executive Officers for the last three fiscal years ended December 31, 2009:2010:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Change in
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Pension Value
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | and
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Non-Equity
| | | Nonqualified
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Incentive
| | | Deferred
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Stock
| | | Option
| | | Plan
| | | Compensation
| | | All Other
| | | | |
Name and Principal
| | | | | | | | Awards
| | | Awards
| | | Compensation
| | | Earnings
| | | Compensation
| | | | |
Position | | Year | | | Salary ($) | | | ($) (a) | | | ($) (b) | | | ($) (c) | | | ($) (d) | | | ($) (e) | | | Total ($) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
M. C. Pigott | | | 2009 | | | $ | 1,350,000 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1,642,321 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1,203,430 | | | $ | 2,450 | | | $ | 4,198,201 | |
Chairman and Chief | | | 2008 | | | | 1,348,846 | | | | 2,951,514 | | | | 848,766 | | | | 3,333,750 | | | | 1,400,351 | | | | 11,500 | | | | 9,894,727 | |
Executive Officer | | | 2007 | | | | 1,300,000 | | | | 2,294,343 | | | | 1,133,363 | | | | 3,277,950 | | | | 935,940 | | | | 11,250 | | | | 8,952,846 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
T. E. Plimpton | | | 2009 | | | | 800,000 | | | | 461,102 | | | | 702,882 | | | | 0 | | | | 749,593 | | | | 2,450 | | | | 2,716,027 | |
Vice Chairman | | | 2008 | | | | 736,885 | | | | 380,923 | | | | 357,121 | | | | 1,475,761 | | | | 916,476 | | | | 11,500 | | | | 3,878,666 | |
(principal financial officer) | | | 2007 | | | | 675,000 | | | | 415,611 | | | | 470,796 | | | | 1,216,440 | | | | 704,432 | | | | 11,250 | | | | 3,493,529 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
J. G. Cardillo | | | 2009 | | | | 625,000 | | | | 267,924 | | | | 549,134 | | | | 0 | | | | 351,033 | | | | 456,224 | | | | 2,249,315 | |
President | | | 2008 | | | | 552,423 | | | | 221,290 | | | | 215,785 | | | | 527,878 | | | | 516,110 | | | | 11,500 | | | | 2,044,986 | |
| | | 2007 | | | | 495,000 | | | | 191,964 | | | | 299,226 | | | | 690,384 | | | | 367,530 | | | | 78,020 | | | | 2,122,124 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
D. D. Sobic | | | 2009 | | | | 460,000 | | | | 166,682 | | | | 323,327 | | | | 0 | | | | 162,208 | | | | 2,450 | | | | 1,114,667 | |
Executive Vice President | | | 2008 | | | | 408,019 | | | | 137,769 | | | | 135,554 | | | | 391,031 | | | | 292,890 | | | | 11,500 | | | | 1,376,763 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
R. E. Armstrong | | | 2009 | | | | 389,385 | | | | 153,495 | | | | 237,234 | | | | 68,640 | | | | 148,184 | | | | 2,450 | | | | 999,388 | |
Senior Vice President | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
M. A. Tembreull | | | 2009 | | | | 34,615 | | | | 531,349 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 59,976 | | | | 70,996 | | | | 696,936 | |
Vice Chairman | | | 2008 | | | | 899,423 | | | | 482,831 | | | | 452,671 | | | | 2,067,270 | | | | 817,495 | | | | 11,500 | | | | 4,731,190 | |
(principal financial officer - retired January 2009) | | | 2007 | | | | 875,000 | | | | 538,730 | | | | 610,263 | | | | 1,722,000 | | | | 960,777 | | | | 11,250 | | | | 4,718,020 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Change in
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Pension Value
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | and
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Nonqualified
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Non-Equity
| | Deferred
| | | | |
| | | | | | Stock
| | Option
| | Incentive Plan
| | Compensation
| | All Other
| | |
Name and Principal
| | | | | | Awards
| | Awards
| | Compensation
| | Earnings
| | Compensation
| | |
Position | | Year | | Salary ($) | | ($)(a) | | ($)(b) | | ($)(c) | | ($)(d) | | ($)(e) | | Total ($) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
M. C. Pigott | | | 2010 | | | | 1,350,000 | | | | 0 | | | | 1,774,097 | | | | 2,700,000 | | | | 1,901,226 | | | | 7,350 | | | | 7,732,673 | |
Chairman and Chief | | | 2009 | | | | 1,350,000 | | | | 0 | | | | 1,642,321 | | | | 3,034,200 | | | | 1,203,430 | | | | 2,450 | | | | 7,232,401 | |
Executive Officer | | | 2008 | | | | 1,348,846 | | | | 2,951,514 | | | | 848,766 | | | | 3,333,750 | | | | 1,400,351 | | | | 11,500 | | | | 9,894,727 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
T. E. Plimpton | | | 2010 | | | | 886,538 | | | | 0 | | | | 1,051,330 | | | | 1,337,500 | | | | 1,684,362 | | | | 7,350 | | | | 4,967,080 | |
Vice Chairman | | | 2009 | | | | 800,000 | | | | 461,102 | | | | 702,882 | | | | 945,270 | | | | 749,593 | | | | 2,450 | | | | 3,661,297 | |
(principal financial officer) | | | 2008 | | | | 736,885 | | | | 380,923 | | | | 357,121 | | | | 1,475,761 | | | | 916,476 | | | | 11,500 | | | | 3,878,666 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
J. G. Cardillo | | | 2010 | | | | 668,269 | | | | 0 | | | | 657,075 | | | | 939,166 | | | | 1,016,072 | | | | 31,870 | | | | 3,312,452 | |
President | | | 2009 | | | | 625,000 | | | | 267,924 | | | | 549,134 | | | | 616,077 | | | | 351,033 | | | | 173,433 | | | | 2.582,601 | |
| | | 2008 | | | | 552,423 | | | | 221,290 | | | | 215,785 | | | | 527,878 | | | | 516,110 | | | | 11,500 | | | | 2,044,986 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
D. D. Sobic | | | 2010 | | | | 463,231 | | | | 0 | | | | 419,134 | | | | 556,500 | | | | 544,757 | | | | 7,350 | | | | 1,990,972 | |
Executive Vice | | | 2009 | | | | 460,000 | | | | 166,682 | | | | 323,327 | | | | 272,118 | | | | 162,208 | | | | 2,450 | | | | 1,386,785 | |
President | | | 2008 | | | | 408,019 | | | | 137,769 | | | | 135,554 | | | | 391,031 | | | | 292,890 | | | | 11,500 | | | | 1,376,763 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
R. J. Christensen | | | 2010 | | | | 419,231 | | | | 0 | | | | 294,373 | | | | 445,541 | | | | 481,308 | | | | 7,350 | | | | 1,647,803 | |
Executive Vice President | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(a) | | Represents the grant date fair value of restricted stock awards on February 6, 2009, January 30, 2008 and February 19,2008, January 31, 2007, February 5, 2007 and April 25, 200619, 2008 calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For additional information, refer to Notes in the Consolidated Financial StatementStatements in the Company’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the applicable fiscal year as shown in footnote (b) below. |
20
| | |
(a) | | M. C. Pigott generously declined the 2009 award of 64,668 shares of restricted stock with an aggregate grant date fair value of $1,992,421. Amounts for M. C. Pigott for 2008 and 2007 include two restricted stock grants, in each year, one of which is the performance-based share match. The compensation cost for the share match awards recognized in the applicable yearaward is based upon the probable outcome of the performance condition as of the grant date consistent with FASB ASC Topic 718. The maximum grant date fair value of the February 19, 2008 share match award is $6,444,000 and the maximum grant date fair value of the February 5, 2007 share match award is $1,732,751.$6,444,000. |
|
(b) | | Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of stock options granted under the Company’s Long Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) on February 2, 2010, February 6, 2009 and January 30, 2008 and January 31, 2007 calculated in |
20
| | |
| | accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For additional accounting information, including the Company’s Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model assumptions, refer to the NotesNote Q in the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the applicable fiscal years ending as follows: December 31,2010 and Note R for 2009 – Note R; December 31, 2008 – Note R; December 31, 2007 – Note P.and 2008. |
|
(c) | | Amounts for 20092010 represent the awards earned under the IC Plan in 20092010 that are determined and paid in 2010.2011. Cash awards earned under the LTIP for the 20072008 – 20092010 cycle will not be determined until late April 2010. Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation amounts for 20082009 and 20072008 include awards under both plans. |
|
(d) | | Represents the interest earned under the Deferred Compensation Plan in excess of 120 percent of the applicable federal long-term rate as prescribed under Section 1274(d) of the Internal Revenue Code (M. C. Pigott $2,815;$715; T. E. Plimpton $53,674;$13,623; J. G. Cardillo $35,752;$9,075; D. D. Sobic $0; R. E. Armstrong $0; M. A. Tembreull $59,976)J. Christensen $1,692 and the aggregate change in value during 20092010 of benefits accrued under the Company’s qualified defined benefit retirement plan and Supplemental Retirement Plan (M. C. Pigott $1,200,614;$1,900,512; T. E. Plimpton $695,919;$1,670,739; J. G. Cardillo $315,281;$1,006,997; D. D. Sobic $162,208;$544,757; R. E. Armstrong $148,184; M. A. Tembreull $0; ).J. Christensen $479,616). Company retirement benefits are described in the accompanying Pension Benefits disclosure. |
|
(e) | | Represents Company matching contributions to the Company’s 401(k) Savings Investment Plan of $2,450$7,350 for each Named Executive Officer for 2010; $2,450 for 2009 (except M. A. Tembreull),and $11,500 for 2008 and $11,250 for 2007.2008. Amount also includes $453,774 in tax equalization in 2009 and $66,770 in 2007 in connection with overseas assignment for J. G. Cardillo also includes tax equalization of $24,520 in 2010 and a $70,996 unused vacation payout made upon retirement for M. A. Tembreull.$170,983 in 2009 in connection with an overseas assignment. Aggregate perquisites were less than $10,000 for each Named Executive Officer. |
21
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
The following table shows all plan-based awards granted to the Named Executive Officers during 2009:2010:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Estimated
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Estimated
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Future
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Future
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Payouts
| | All Other
| | All Other
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Payouts
| | All Other
| | All Other
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Under
| | Stock
| | Option
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Under
| | Stock
| | Option
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Equity
| | Awards:
| | Awards:
| | Exercise
| | Grant Date
| | | | | | | | | | | Equity
| | Awards:
| | Awards:
| | Exercise
| | Grant Date
| |
| | | | | | | | | | Incentive
| | Number of
| | Number of
| | or Base
| | Fair Value of
| | | | | | | | | | | Incentive
| | Number of
| | Number of
| | or Base
| | Fair Value
| |
| | | | Estimated Future Payouts Under
| | Plan
| | Shares of
| | Securities
| | Price of
| | Stock And
| | | | | Estimated Future Payouts Under
| | Plan
| | Shares of
| | Securities
| | Price of
| | of Stock
| |
| | | | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards | | Awards
| | Stock or
| | Underlying
| | Option
| | Option
| | | | | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards | | Awards
| | Stock or
| | Underlying
| | Option
| | And Option
| |
| | Grant
| | Threshold
| | Target
| | Maximum
| | Target
| | Units
| | Options
| | Awards
| | Awards
| | | Grant
| | Threshold
| | Target
| | Maximum
| | Target
| | Units
| | Options
| | Awards
| | Awards
| |
Name | | Date | | ($) | | ($) | | ($) | | (#) | | (#) | | (#) | | ($/Sh) | | ($) | | | Date | | ($) | | ($) | | ($) | | (#) | | (#) | | (#) | | ($/Sh) | | ($) | |
| | | | |
|
M. C. Pigott | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Restricted Stock(a) | | | 2/06/2009 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 0 | | | | NA | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 0 | | |
Stock Options(a) | | | 2/06/2009 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 194,004 | | | | 30.81 | | | | 1,642,321 | | | | 2/2/10 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 134,492 | | | | 36.12 | | | | 1,774,097 | |
LTIP Cash(a) | | | | | | | 73,636 | | | | 810,000 | | | | 1,620,000 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | | | | | 184,091 | | | | 2,025,000 | | | | 4,050,000 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Annual Incentive Cash(b) | | | | | | | 540,000 | | | | 1,350,000 | | | | 2,160,000 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | | | | | 540,000 | | | | 1,350,000 | | | | 2,700,000 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| | |
T. E. Plimpton | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Restricted Stock(a) | | | 2/06/2009 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 14,966 | | | | NA | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 461,102 | | |
Stock Options(a) | | | 2/06/2009 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 83,030 | | | | 30.81 | | | | 702,882 | | | | 2/2/10 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 79,700 | | | | 36.12 | | | | 1,051,331 | |
LTIP Cash(a) | | | | | | | 36,364 | | | | 400,000 | | | | 800,000 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | | | | | 72,727 | | | | 800,000 | | | | 1,600,000 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Annual Incentive Cash(b) | | | | | | | 240,000 | | | | 600,000 | | | | 960,000 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | | | | | 267,500 | | | | 668,750 | | | | 1,337,500 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| | |
J. G. Cardillo | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Restricted Stock(a) | | | 2/06/2009 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 8,696 | | | | NA | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 267,924 | | |
Stock Options(a) | | | 2/06/2009 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 64,868 | | | | 30.81 | | | | 549,134 | | | | 2/2/10 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 49,812 | | | | 36.12 | | | | 657,075 | |
LTIP Cash(a) | | | | | | | 12,784 | | | | 281,250 | | | | 562,500 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | | | | | 25,568 | | | | 562,500 | | | | 1,125,000 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Annual Incentive Cash(b) | | | | | | | 175,000 | | | | 437,500 | | | | 700,000 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | | | | | 187,833 | | | | 469,583 | | | | 939,166 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| | |
D. D. Sobic | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Restricted Stock(a) | | | 2/06/2009 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 5,410 | | | | NA | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 166,682 | | |
Stock Options(a) | | | 2/06/2009 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 38,194 | | | | 30.81 | | | | 323,327 | | | | 2/2/10 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 31,774 | | | | 36.12 | | | | 419,134 | |
LTIP Cash(a) | | | | | | | 7,318 | | | | 161,000 | | | | 322,000 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | | | | | 14,636 | | | | 322,000 | | | | 644,000 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Annual Incentive Cash(b) | | | | | | | 110,400 | | | | 276,000 | | | | 441,600 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | | | | | 111,300 | | | | 278,250 | | | | 556,500 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| | |
R. E. Armstrong | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Restricted Stock(a) | | | 2/06/2009 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 4,982 | | | | NA | | | | - | | | | | | | | 153,495 | | |
R. J. Christensen | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stock Options(a) | | | 2/06/2009 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 28,024 | | | | 30.81 | | | | 237,234 | | | | 2/2/10 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 22,316 | | | | 36.12 | | | | 294,373 | |
LTIP Cash(a) | | | | | | | 5,318 | | | | 117,000 | | | | 234,000 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | | | | | 10,909 | | | | 240,000 | | | | 480,000 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Annual Incentive Cash(b) | | | | | | | 85,000 | | | | 214,500 | | | | 343,200 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | | | | | 28,900 | | | | 240,833 | | | | 481,666 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| | |
M. A. Tembreull | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Restricted Stock(a) | | | 2/06/2009 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 17,246 | | | | NA | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 531,349 | | |
Stock Options(a) | | | | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | |
LTIP Cash(a) | | | | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | |
Annual Incentive Cash(b) | | | | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | |
| | |
(a) | | Represents grants and awards under the LTIP described on pages15-18. The grant date fair value of restricted stock awards is the number of restricted shares multiplied by the closing price of Company stock on the grant date of $30.81. M. C. Pigott generously declined the 2009 award of 64,668 shares of restricted stock with a grant date fair value of $1,992,421.page 15. |
|
(b) | | Represents awards under the Company’s Senior Executive Yearly Incentive Compensation Plan (IC) described on page 15.14. |
22
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
The following table shows all outstanding stock option and restricted stock awards held by the Named Executive Officers on December 31, 2009:2010:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Option Awards(a) | | Stock Awards |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Equity
|
| | Option Awards(a) | | Stock Awards | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Incentive
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Equity
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Equity
| | Plan
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Equity
| | Incentive
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Incentive
| | Awards:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Incentive
| | Plan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Plan
| | Market or
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Market
| | Plan
| | Awards:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Market
| | Awards:
| | Payout
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | Number
| | Value of
| | Awards:
| | Market or
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Value of
| | Number of
| | Value of
|
| | | | Number
| | | | | | | | of
| | Shares
| | Number of
| | Payout Value
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Shares
| | Unearned
| | Unearned
|
| | Number of
| | of
| | | | | | | | Shares
| | or Units
| | Unearned
| | of Unearned
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | or Units
| | Shares,
| | Shares,
|
| | Securities
| | Securities
| | | | | | | | or Units
| | of Stock
| | Shares, Units
| | Shares, Units
| | | Number of
| | Number of
| | | | | | | | | | of Stock
| | Units or
| | Units or
|
| | Underlying
| | Underlying
| | | | | | | | of Stock
| | That
| | or Other
| | or Other
| | | Securities
| | Securities
| | | | | | | | Number of
| | That
| | Other
| | Other
|
| | Unexercised
| | Unexercised
| | Option
| | | | | | That
| | Have
| | Rights
| | Rights That
| | | Underlying
| | Underlying
| | | | | | | | Shares or Units of
| | Have
| | Rights
| | Rights That
|
| | Options
| | Options
| | Exercise
| | Option
| | Option
| | Have Not
| | Not
| | That Have
| | Have Not
| | | Unexercised
| | Unexercised
| | Option Exercise
| | Option
| | Option
| | Stock That Have Not
| | Not
| | That Have
| | Have Not
|
| | (#)
| | (#)
| | Price
| | Vesting
| | Expiration
| | Vested
| | Vested
| | Not Vested
| | Vested
| | | Options (#)
| | Options (#)
| | Price
| | Vesting
| | Expiration
| | Vested
| | Vested
| | Not Vested
| | Vested
|
Name | | Exercisable | | Unexercisable | | ($) | | Date | | Date | | (#) | | ($)(h) | | (#) | | ($)(h) | | | Exercisable | | Unexercisable | | ($) | | Date | | Date | | (#) | | ($)(g) | | (#) | | ($)(g) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
M. C. Pigott | | | 342,339 | | | | 0 | | | | 10.1975 | | | | 1/1/04 | | | | 1/24/11 | | | | 14,734 | (b) | | | 534,402 | | | | 37,500 | (f) | | | 1,360,125 | | | | 284,724 | | | | 0 | | | | 12.5353 | | | | 1/1/05 | | | | 1/23/12 | | | 11,226(b) | | | 643,699 | | | | 37,500 | (e) | | | 2,150,250 | |
| | | 284,724 | | | | 0 | | | | 12.5353 | | | | 1/1/05 | | | | 1/23/12 | | | | 22,453 | (c) | | | 814,370 | | | | 150,000 | (g) | | | 5,440,500 | | | | 248,427 | | | | 0 | | | | 13.9555 | | | | 1/1/06 | | | | 1/15/13 | | | 19,790(c) | | | 1,134,759 | | | | 150,000 | (f) | | | 8,601,000 | |
| | | 248,427 | | | | 0 | | | | 13.9555 | | | | 1/1/06 | | | | 1/15/13 | | | | 29,686 | (d) | | | 1,076,711 | | | | | | | | | | | | 135,067 | | | | 0 | | | | 25.3126 | | | | 1/1/07 | | | | 1/15/14 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 135,067 | | | | 0 | | | | 25.3126 | | | | 1/1/07 | | | | 1/15/14 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 173,043 | | | | 0 | | | | 32.1111 | | | | 1/1/08 | | | | 1/20/15 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 173,043 | | | | 0 | | | | 32.1111 | | | | 1/1/08 | | | | 1/20/15 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 147,343 | | | | 0 | | | | 32.2267 | | | | 1/1/09 | | | | 1/26/16 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 147,343 | | | | 0 | | | | 32.2267 | | | | 1/1/09 | | | | 1/26/16 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 112,266 | | | | 0 | | | | 44.5600 | | | | 1/1/10 | | | | 1/31/17 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 0 | | | | 112,266 | | | | 44.5600 | | | | 1/1/10 | | | | 1/31/17 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0 | | | | 98,956 | | | | 45.7400 | | | | 1/1/11 | | | | 1/30/18 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 0 | | | | 98,956 | | | | 45.7400 | | | | 1/1/11 | | | | 1/30/18 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0 | | | | 194,004 | | | | 30.8100 | | | | 1/1/12 | | | | 2/06/19 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 0 | | | | 194,004 | | | | 30.8100 | | | | 1/1/12 | | | | 2/06/19 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0 | | | | 134,492 | | | | 36.1200 | | | | 1/1/13 | | | | 2/02/20 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
T. E. Plimpton | | | 49,128 | | | | 0 | | | | 13.9555 | | | | 1/1/06 | | | | 1/15/13 | | | | 3,017 | (b) | | | 109,427 | | | | | | | | | | | | 25,255 | | | | 0 | | | | 25.3126 | | | | 1/1/07 | | | | 1/15/14 | | | 2,331(b) | | | 133,660 | | | | | | | |
| | | 55,255 | | | | 0 | | | | 25.3126 | | | | 1/1/07 | | | | 1/15/14 | | | | 4,663 | (c) | | | 169,127 | | | | | | | | | | | | 63,990 | | | | 0 | | | | 32.1111 | | | | 1/1/08 | | | | 1/20/15 | | | 4,164(c) | | | 238,764 | | | | | | | |
| | | 63,990 | | | | 0 | | | | 32.1111 | | | | 1/1/08 | | | | 1/20/15 | | | | 6,246 | (d) | | | 226,542 | | | | | | | | | | | | 60,354 | | | | 0 | | | | 32.2267 | | | | 1/1/09 | | | | 1/26/16 | | | 11,224(d) | | | 643,584 | | | | | | | |
| | | 60,354 | | | | 0 | | | | 32.2267 | | | | 1/1/09 | | | | 1/26/16 | | | | 14,966 | (e) | | | 542,817 | | | | | | | | | | | | 46,635 | | | | 0 | | | | 44.5600 | | | | 1/1/10 | | | | 1/31/17 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 0 | | | | 46,635 | | | | 44.5600 | | | | 1/1/10 | | | | 1/31/17 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0 | | | | 41,636 | | | | 45.7400 | | | | 1/1/11 | | | | 1/30/18 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 0 | | | | 41,636 | | | | 45.7400 | | | | 1/1/11 | | | | 1/30/18 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0 | | | | 83,030 | | | | 30.8100 | | | | 1/1/12 | | | | 2/06/19 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 0 | | | | 83,030 | | | | 30.8100 | | | | 1/1/12 | | | | 2/06/19 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0 | | | | 79,700 | | | | 36.1200 | | | | 1/1/13 | | | | 2/02/20 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
J. G. Cardillo | | | 19,486 | | | | 0 | | | | 25.3126 | | | | 1/1/07 | | | | 1/15/14 | | | | 1,335 | (b) | | | 48,420 | | | | | | | | | | | | 29,640 | | | | 0 | | | | 44.5600 | | | | 1/1/10 | | | | 1/31/17 | | | 1,077(b) | | | 61,755 | | | | | | | |
| | | 27,688 | | | | 0 | | | | 32.1111 | | | | 1/1/08 | | | | 1/20/15 | | | | 2,154 | (c) | | | 78,126 | | | | | | | | | | | | 0 | | | | 25,158 | | | | 45.7400 | | | | 1/1/11 | | | | 1/30/18 | | | 2,418(c) | | | 138,648 | | | | | | | |
| | | 28,057 | | | | 0 | | | | 32.2267 | | | | 1/1/09 | | | | 1/26/16 | | | | 3,628 | (d) | | | 131,588 | | | | | | | | | | | | 0 | | | | 64,868 | | | | 30.8100 | | | | 1/1/12 | | | | 2/06/19 | | | 6,522(d) | | | 373,971 | | | | | | | |
| | | 0 | | | | 29,640 | | | | 44.5600 | | | | 1/1/10 | | | | 1/31/17 | | | | 8,696 | (e) | | | 315,404 | | | | | | | | | | | | 0 | | | | 49,812 | | | | 36.1200 | | | | 1/1/13 | | | | 2/02/20 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 0 | | | | 25,158 | | | | 45.7400 | | | | 1/1/11 | | | | 1/30/18 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 0 | | | | 64,868 | | | | 30.8100 | | | | 1/1/12 | | | | 2/06/19 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
D. D. Sobic | | | 675 | | | | 0 | | | | 10.1975 | | | | 1/1/04 | | | | 1/24/11 | | | | 2,259 | (d) | | | 81,934 | | | | | | | | | | | | 9,000 | | | | 0 | | | | 25.3126 | | | | 1/1/07 | | | | 1/15/14 | | | 1,506(c) | | | 86,354 | | | | | | | |
| | | 300 | | | | 0 | | | | 12.5353 | | | | 1/1/05 | | | | 1/23/12 | | | | 5,410 | (e) | | | 196,221 | | | | | | | | | | | | 14,305 | | | | 0 | | | | 32.1111 | | | | 1/1/08 | | | | 1/20/15 | | | 4,057(d) | | | 232,628 | | | | | | | |
| | | 1,147 | | | | 0 | | | | 13.9555 | | | | 1/1/06 | | | | 1/15/13 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 16,321 | | | | 0 | | | | 32.2267 | | | | 1/1/09 | | | | 1/26/16 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 17,191 | | | | 0 | | | | 25.3126 | | | | 1/1/07 | | | | 1/15/14 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 18,618 | | | | 0 | | | | 44.5600 | | | | 1/1/10 | | | | 1/31/17 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 14,305 | | | | 0 | | | | 32.1111 | | | | 1/1/08 | | | | 1/20/15 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0 | | | | 15,804 | | | | 45.7400 | | | | 1/1/11 | | | | 1/30/18 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 16,321 | | | | 0 | | | | 32.2267 | | | | 1/1/09 | | | | 1/26/16 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0 | | | | 38,194 | | | | 30.8100 | | | | 1/1/12 | | | | 2/06/19 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 0 | | | | 18,618 | | | | 44.5600 | | | | 1/1/10 | | | | 1/31/17 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0 | | | | 31,774 | | | | 36.1200 | | | | 1/1/13 | | | | 2/02/20 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 0 | | | | 15,804 | | | | 45.7400 | | | | 1/1/11 | | | | 1/30/18 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 0 | | | | 38,194 | | | | 30.8100 | | | | 1/1/12 | | | | 2/06/19 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
R. E. Armstrong | | | 14,142 | | | | 0 | | | | 13.9555 | | | | 1/1/06 | | | | 1/15/13 | | | | 1,086 | (d) | | | 39,389 | | | | | | | | | | |
R. J. Christensen | | | | 15,021 | | | | 0 | | | | 32.1111 | | | | 1/1/08 | | | | 1/20/15 | | | 704(c) | | | 40,367 | | | | | | | |
| | | 12,790 | | | | 0 | | | | 25.3126 | | | | 1/1/07 | | | | 1/15/14 | | | | 4,982 | (e) | | | 180,697 | | | | | | | | | | | | 16,321 | | | | 0 | | | | 32.2267 | | | | 1/1/09 | | | | 1/26/16 | | | 1,897(d) | | | 108,774 | | | | | | | |
| | | 12,046 | | | | 0 | | | | 32.1111 | | | | 1/1/08 | | | | 1/20/15 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 14,508 | | | | 0 | | | | 44.5600 | | | | 1/1/10 | | | | 1/31/17 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 13,675 | | | | 0 | | | | 32.2267 | | | | 1/1/09 | | | | 1/26/16 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0 | | | | 12,316 | | | | 45.7400 | | | | 1/1/11 | | | | 1/30/18 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 0 | | | | 13,704 | | | | 44.5600 | | | | 1/1/10 | | | | 1/31/17 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0 | | | | 28,742 | | | | 30.8100 | | | | 1/1/12 | | | | 2/06/19 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 0 | | | | 15,188 | | | | 45.7400 | | | | 1/1/11 | | | | 1/30/18 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0 | | | | 22,316 | | | | 36.1200 | | | | 1/1/13 | | | | 2/02/20 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 0 | | | | 28,024 | | | | 30.8100 | | | | 1/1/12 | | | | 2/06/19 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
M. A. Tembreull | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0 | | | | NA | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(a) | | Represents stock options granted under the LTIP. The vesting date may be accelerated if a change in control occurs. Options expire ten years from the date of grant unless employment is terminated earlier. |
|
(b) | | Represents restricted stock granted April 26, 2006.January 31, 2007. Twenty-five percent of the shares vest on each subsequent January 1. The remaining vesting date is January 1, 2010.2011. |
23
| | |
(c) | | Represents restricted stock granted January 31, 2007. Twenty-five percent of the shares vest on each subsequent January 1. The remaining vesting dates are January 1, 2010 and January 1, 2011. |
|
(d) | | Represents restricted stock granted on January 30, 2008. Twenty-five percent of the shares vest on each subsequent January 1. The remaining vesting dates are January 1, 2010; January 1, 2011 and January 1, 2012. |
23
| | |
(e)(d) | | Represents restricted stock granted on February 6, 2009. Twenty-five percent of the shares vest on each subsequent January 1. The remaining vesting dates are January 1, 2010; January 1, 2011;2011 and January 1, 2012 and January 1, 2013. |
|
(e) | | Represents restricted stock under the share match program scheduled to vest on December 31, 2011. |
|
(f) | | Represents restricted stock under the share match program scheduled to vest on December 31, 2011.2012. |
|
(g) | | Represents restricted stock under the share match program scheduled to vest on December 31, 2012. |
|
(h) | | The amount shown represents the number of shares multiplied by the closing price of the Company’s stock on December 31, 20092010 of $36.27.$57.34. |
Option Exercises and Stock Vested
The following table shows all stock options exercised and restricted stock awards that vested during 20092010 for the Named Executive Officers and the value realized upon exercise or vesting:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Option Awards | | Stock Awards | | | Option Awards | | Stock Awards | |
| | | | | | Number of
| | | | | | | | | Number of
| | | |
| | | | Value
| | Shares
| | Value
| | | | | Value
| | Shares
| | | |
| | Number of
| | Realized on
| | Acquired on
| | Realized
| | | Number of
| | Realized
| | Acquired on
| | Value Realized
| |
| | Shares Acquired
| | Exercise
| | Vesting
| | on Vesting
| | | Shares Acquired
| | on Exercise
| | Vesting
| | on Vesting
| |
Name | | on Exercise (#) | | ($) | | (#) | | ($) | | | on Exercise (#) | | ($) | | (#) | | ($) | |
|
M. C. Pigott(a) | | | 662,168 | | | | 15,499,007 | | | | 35,857 | | | | 1,025,510 | | | | 342,339 | | | | 14,814,435 | | | | 35,857 | | | | 1,330,222 | |
T. E. Plimpton | | | 25,000 | | | | 638,013 | | | | 7,431 | | | | 212,527 | | | | 79,128 | | | | 2,587,314 | | | | 7,431 | | | | 289,239 | |
J. G. Cardillo | | | 69,433 | | | | 1,759,001 | | | | 3,623 | | | | 103,618 | | | | 75,231 | | | | 1,483,033 | | | | 3,622 | | | | 142,829 | |
D. D. Sobic | | | 1,200 | | | | 31,176 | | | | 753 | | | | 21,536 | | | | 10,313 | | | | 288,161 | | | | 753 | | | | 27,311 | |
R. E. Armstrong | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 362 | | | | 10,353 | | |
M. A. Tembreull | | | 197,955 | | | | 1,275,540 | | | | 44,791 | | | | 1,319,136 | | |
R. J. Christensen | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 352 | | | | 12,767 | |
| | |
(a) | | M. C. Pigott exercised stock options that were granted in 19992001 and 2000 and were due to expire perin accordance with the LTIP agreement. |
24
Pension Benefits
The following table shows the present value of the retirement benefit payable to the Named Executive Officers under the Company’s noncontributory retirement plan and Supplemental Retirement Plan as of December 31, 2009:2010:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Number
| | Present
| | | | | | | | Present
| | | | |
| | | | of Years
| | Value of
| | Payments
| | | | Number of
| | Value of
| | Payments
| | |
| | | | Credited
| | Accumulated
| | During Last
| | | | Years
| | Accumulated
| | During Last
| | |
| | | | Service
| | Benefit
| | Fiscal Year
| | | | Credited Service
| | Benefit
| | Fiscal Year
| | |
Name | | Plan Name | | (#) | | ($) | | ($) | | Plan Name | | (#) | | ($) | | ($) | | |
|
M. C. Pigott | | Retirement Plan | | 30 | | | 737,519 | | | | 0 | | | | | Retirement Plan | | 31 | | | 895,667 | | | | 0 | | | |
| | Supplemental Retirement Plan | | 30 | | | 10,241,876 | | | | 0 | | | | | Supplemental Retirement Plan | | 31 | | | 11,984,240 | | | | 0 | | | |
T. E. Plimpton | | Retirement Plan | | 33 | | | 1,068,524 | | | | 0 | | | | | Retirement Plan | | 34 | | | 1,265,573 | | | | 0 | | | |
| | Supplemental Retirement Plan | | 33 | | | 5,862,476 | | | | 0 | | | | | Supplemental Retirement Plan | | 34 | | | 7,336,165 | | | | 0 | | | |
J. G. Cardillo | | Retirement Plan | | 19 | | | 672,971 | | | | 0 | | | | | Retirement Plan | | 20 | | | 789,690 | | | | 0 | | | |
| | Supplemental Retirement Plan | | 19 | | | 1,944,065 | | | | 0 | | | | | Supplemental Retirement Plan | | 20 | | | 2,834,344 | | | | 0 | | | |
D. D. Sobic | | Retirement Plan | | 19 | | | 501,200 | | | | 0 | | | | | Retirement Plan | | 20 | | | 617,249 | | | | 0 | | | |
| | Supplemental Retirement Plan | | 19 | | | 813,597 | | | | 0 | | | | | Supplemental Retirement Plan | | 20 | | | 1,242,304 | | | | 0 | | | |
R. E. Armstrong | | Retirement Plan | | 16 | | | 375,937 | | | | 0 | | | | |
R. J. Christensen | | | Retirement Plan | | 27 | | | 667,418 | | | | 0 | | | |
| | Supplemental Retirement Plan | | 16 | | | 529,493 | | | | 0 | | | | | Supplemental Retirement Plan | | 27 | | | 1,143,824 | | | | 0 | | | |
M. A. Tembreull | | Retirement Plan | | 35 | | | N/A | | | | 81,237 | | | | |
| | Supplemental Retirement Plan | | 35 | | | N/A | | | | 645,641 | | | | |
24
The Company’s qualified noncontributory retirement plan has been in effect since 1947. The Named Executive Officers participate in this plan on the same basis as other salaried employees. Employees are eligible to become a member in the plan after completion of 12 months of employment with at least 1,000 hours of service. The plan provides benefits based on years of service and salary. Participants are vested in their retirement benefits after five years of service.
The benefit for each year of service, up to a maximum of 35 years, is equal to one percent of highest average salary plus 0.5 percent of highest average salary in excess of the Social-Security-covered compensation level. Highest average salary is defined as the average of the highest 60 consecutive months of an employee’s cash compensation, which includes base salary and annual incentive cash compensation, but it excludes compensation under the LTIP. The benefits are not subject to any deduction for Social Security or other offset amounts. Benefits from the plan are paid as a monthly single-life annuity or, if married, actuarially-equivalent 50 percent, 75 percent or 100 percent joint and survivor annuity options are also available. Survivor benefits based on the 50 percent joint and survivor option will be paid to an eligible spouse if the employee is a vested member in the plan and dies before retirement.
The Company’s unfunded Supplemental Retirement Plan (SRP) provides a retirement benefit to those affected by the maximum benefit limitations permitted for qualified plans by the Internal Revenue Code and to those deferring incentive compensation bonuses. The benefit is equal to the amount of normal pension benefit reduction resulting from the application of maximum benefit and salary limitations and the exclusion of deferred incentive compensation bonuses from the retirement plan benefit formula. Benefits from the plan are paid as a lifetime monthly annuity or a single lump sumlump-sum distribution at the executive’s election and will be made at the later of: (1) termination of employment;employment or (2) age 55 with 15 years of service or age 65, whichever occurs first; or (3) twelve months from the date the payment election is made.participant attains age 55. If the participant dies before the supplemental benefit commencement date, the participant’s surviving spouse will be eligible to receive a survivor pension for the amount by which the total survivor pension benefit exceeds the surviving spouse’s retirement plan benefit.
Normal retirement age under both plans is 65 and participants may retire early between ages 55 and 65 if they have 15 years of service. For retirement at ages 55 through 61 with 15 years of service, pension benefits are reduced four percent per year from age 65. For retirement at or after age 62 with 15 years of service, there
25
is no reduction in retirement benefits. As of December 31, 2009,2010, J. G. Cardillo was eligible for an unreduced benefit and M. C. Pigott, T. E. Plimpton J. G. Cardillo and D. D. Sobic are eligible for a reduced early retirement benefit. M. A. Tembreull retired in 2009 and received the payments noted above following his retirement.
The Pension Plan table shows the present value of the accrued retirement benefits for the Named Executive Officers under the Company’s retirement plan and Supplemental Retirement Plan based on highest average salary and service as of December 31, 2009.2010. The retirement benefits were calculated using the assumptions found in the Notes for Consolidated Financial Statements under Note ML of the Company’s 20092010 Annual Report onForm 10-K. Depending on executive recruitment considerations, additional years of service may be offered to new executives.
25
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
The following table provides information about the deferred compensation accounts of the Named Executive Officers as of December 31, 2009.2010. Amounts deferred reflect cash awards payable in prior years but voluntarily deferred by the executive:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Executive
| | | | Aggregate
| | Aggregate
| | | Executive
| | Aggregate
| | Aggregate
| | Aggregate
| |
| | Contribution in
| | Aggregate
| | Withdrawals/
| | Balance as of
| | | Contribution in
| | Earnings in
| | Withdrawals/
| | Balance as of
| |
| | 2009
| | Earnings in 2009
| | Distributions
| | 12/31/2009 (a)
| | | 2010
| | 2010
| | Distributions
| | 12/31/2010
| |
Name | | ($) | | ($) | | ($) | | ($) | | | ($) | | ($) | | ($) | | (a)($) | |
|
M. C. Pigott | | | 0 | | | | 1,232,331 | | | | 0 | | | | 5,568,653 | | | | 0 | | | | 3,239,017 | | | | 0 | | | | 8,807,670 | |
T. E. Plimpton | | | 0 | | | | 337,886 | | | | 0 | | | | 4,590,391 | | | | 0 | | | | 481,015 | | | | 0 | | | | 5,071,406 | |
J. G. Cardillo | | | 0 | | | | 159,511 | | | | 0 | | | | 2,770,121 | | | | 0 | | | | 146,949 | | | | 0 | | | | 2,917,070 | |
D. D. Sobic | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
R. E. Armstrong | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | |
M. A. Tembreull | | | 0 | | | | 1,400,842 | | | | 0 | | | | 9,617,982 | | |
R. J. Christensen | | | | 0 | | | | 27,402 | | | | 0 | | | | 543,956 | |
| | |
(a) | | To the extent required to be reported, all cash awards were reported as compensation to the Named Executive Officer in the Summary Compensation Table for previous years. |
The Company’s DCDeferred Compensation Plan provides all eligible employees, including the Named Executive Officers, an opportunity to voluntarily defer all or part of the cash awards earned and payable under the LTIP and the IC Plan. The Company makes no contributions to the Plan. Accounts are credited with interest or dividend equivalents as described below.
A portion of the amount in the 20092010 Aggregate Earnings column is reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the Named Executive Officers as follows: M. C. Pigott $2,815;$715; T. E. Plimpton $53,674;$13,623; J. G. Cardillo $35,752; and M. A. Tembreull $59,976.$9,075; D. D. Sobic $0; R. J. Christensen $1,692.
The Named Executive Officers have elected to defer into an income account, a stock unit account or any combination of each. Deferral elections were made in the year before the award was payable. Cash awards were credited to the income account as of January in the year the award was payable and interest is compounded quarterly on the account balance based on the simple combined average of monthly Aa Industrial Bond Yield averages for the previous quarter. The Named Executive Officer may elect to be paid out the balance in the income account in a lump sum or in up to 15 substantially equal annual installments. Cash awards credited to the stock unit account are based on the average closing price of a share of the Company’s common stock on the first five trading days in January of the year the cash award was payable. Dividend equivalents are credited to the stock unit account based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date the dividend is paid to stockholders. The stock unit account is paid out in a single distribution of whole shares of the Company’s common stock.
26
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
The Named Executive Officers do not have severance or change in control agreements with the Company. The information below describes certain compensation that would become payable under existing plans if each Named Executive Officer’s employment terminated or a change in control occurred on December 31, 2009.2010. These payments are in addition to deferred compensation balances and the present value of accumulated Supplemental Retirement Plan benefits reported in the “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” and “Pension Benefits” tables.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | M. C.
| | T. E.
| | J. G.
| | D. D.
| | R. E.
| | M. A.
| | | M. C.
| | T. E.
| | J. G.
| | D. D.
| | R. J.
| |
| | Pigott | | Plimpton | | Cardillo | | Sobic | | Armstrong | | Tembreull | | | Pigott | | Plimpton | | Cardillo | | Sobic | | Christensen | |
|
Termination for Cause | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | N/A | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | |
Termination Without Cause | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | N/A | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Retirement | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Annual Incentive Plan | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | NA | | | | 0 | | | | 2,700,000 | | | | 1,337,500 | | | | 939,166 | | | | 556,500 | | | | N/A | |
Long-Term Performance Award | | | 3,467,100 | | | | 1,080,135 | | | | 308,039 | | | | 268,191 | | | | NA | | | | 0 | | | | 2,025,000 | | | | 639,000 | | | | 346,500 | | | | 231,000 | | | | N/A | |
Restricted Stock | | | 9,226,109 | | | | 912,191 | | | | 494,687 | | | | 229,081 | | | | NA | | | | 531,349 | | | | 12,529,707 | | | | 1,016,007 | | | | 979,310 | | | | 318,982 | | | | N/A | |
Total | | | 12,693,209 | | | | 1,992,326 | | | | 802,725 | | | | 497,272 | | | | NA | | | | 531,349 | | | | 17,254,707 | | | | 2,992,507 | | | | 2,264,976 | | | | 1,106,482 | | | | N/A | |
Death | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Annual Incentive Plan | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 68,640 | | | | N/A | | | | 2,700,000 | | | | 1,337,500 | | | | 939,166 | | | | 556,500 | | | | 445,541 | |
Long-Term Performance Award | | | 5,087,100 | | | | 1,639,468 | | | | 632,789 | | | | 475,858 | | | | 460,870 | | | | N/A | | | | 3,240,000 | | | | 1,172,333 | | | | 721,500 | | | | 445,667 | | | | 340,000 | |
Restricted Stock | | | 9,226,109 | | | | 912,191 | | | | 494,687 | | | | 229,081 | | | | 174,894 | | | | N/A | | | | 12,529,707 | | | | 1,016,007 | | | | 574,375 | | | | 318,982 | | | | 149,141 | |
Total | | | 14,313,209 | | | | 2,551,659 | | | | 1,127,475 | | | | 704,939 | | | | 704,404 | | | | N/A | | | | 18,469,707 | | | | 3,525,840 | | | | 2,235,041 | | | | 1,321,149 | | | | 934,682 | |
Change in control | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Annual Incentive Plan | | | 2,160,000 | | | | 960,000 | | | | 700,000 | | | | 441,600 | | | | 343,200 | | | | N/A | | | | 2,700,000 | | | | 1,337,500 | | | | 939,166 | | | | 556,500 | | | | 481,666 | |
Long-Term Performance Award | | | 7,140,000 | | | | 2,333,667 | | | | 1,342,500 | | | | 877,333 | | | | 714,000 | | | | N/A | | | | 6,480,000 | | | | 2,344,667 | | | | 1,443,000 | | | | 891,333 | | | | 680,000 | |
Restricted Stock | | | 9,226,109 | | | | 912,191 | | | | 494,687 | | | | 229,081 | | | | 174,894 | | | | N/A | | | | 12,529,707 | | | | 1,016,007 | | | | 574,375 | | | | 318,982 | | | | 149,141 | |
Total | | | 18,526,109 | | | | 4,205,857 | | | | 2,537,187 | | | | 1,548,015 | | | | 1,232,094 | | | | N/A | | | | 21,709,707 | | | | 4,698,174 | | | | 2,956,541 | | | | 1,766,815 | | | | 1,310,807 | |
Termination for Cause. If a Named Executive Officer had been terminated for “cause,” as defined in the Company’s LTIP, all unpaid cash incentives under the IC Plan and the LTIP, stock options (vested and unvested), restricted stock, deferred compensation balances and accrued Supplemental Retirement Plan benefits would have been immediately forfeited.
Resignation or Termination withoutWithout Cause. If a Named Executive Officer had resigned or been terminated without cause, all unpaid incentives under the IC Plan and the LTIP, unvested stock options and restricted stock would have been immediately forfeited. Vested stock options with expiration dates of January 25, 2010, through January 15, 2014, would remain exercisable for three months from the date of termination. All other vested stock options would remain exercisable for one month from the date of termination (expiration dates and number of stock options are disclosed in the “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End” table).
Deferred compensation balances, as described in the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table, would be paid in a lump sum or in installments according to the payment election filed by the Named Executive Officer. The Named Executive Officer may elect to have such payments made or commence in any January that is at least 12 months from the date of such payment election, but no later than the first January following the year in which the executive attainsage 70-1/2.
Accrued Supplemental Retirement Plan benefits described under the Pension Benefits Table would be paid in a form previously elected by the Named Executive Officer. M. C. Pigott, T. E. Plimpton, and J. G. Cardillo and R. E. Armstrong would receive single lump-sum cash payments. D. D. Sobic and R. J Christensen would receive monthly annuities payable for life. If termination occurred on December 31, 2009,2010, these payments would be made or would commence in accordance with the terms of the Plan on January 1, 20102011 for M. C. Pigott,
27
T. E. Plimpton, J. G. Cardillo and D. D. Sobic. Payments for R. E. ArmstrongJ. Christensen would begin when first eligible to receive retirement benefits under the qualified Retirement Plan.at age 55.
27
Retirement. R. E. ArmstrongJ. Christensen was not eligible to receive retirement benefits on December 31, 20092010 due to the age threshold. All others were eligible for early retirement benefits only. Deferred compensation balances and accumulated Supplemental Retirement Plan benefits would have been payable for the other Named Executive Officers as described above under “Resignation or Termination without Cause”
Annual incentive compensation earned in 20092010 would have been paid in the first quarter of 20102011 and long-term incentive cash awards earned under the2007-20092008-2010 performance cycle would be paid in April 20102011 based on actual performance against goals. The long-term performance awards in the table reflect target awards. Unvested stock options would have been immediately forfeited and vested stock options would have remained exercisable for 12 months following the date of retirement. All annual restricted stock would be immediately vested. M. A. Tembreullvested if retirement is age 62 or greater. J. G. Cardillo, who retired on January 2, 2009 andas President in December 2010 at age 62, was not eligible for the benefits stated above. Amounts listed include a 2009 annual incentive award or a long-term performance award for the2007-2009 cycle. He received an annual restricted stock award in February 2009 based on 20082011 for 2010 performance. All unvested restricted stock vested upon his retirement.
Death. In the event of death on December 31, 2009,2010, beneficiaries of the Named Executive Officers would have been entitled to receive all of the benefits that would have been paid to a Named Executive Officer who had retired on that date as described above, with the following exceptions:
Long-term incentive cash awards earned under the2008-20102009-2011 LTIP performance cycle and the2009-20112010-2012 LTIP performance cycle would have been paid on a prorated basis (2/3 and 1/3, respectively) following completion of the cycle, based on actual performance against goals. Restricted stock awarded under the share match program would vest following completion of the cycle if the performance goal is achieved.
Change in control. Benefits payable in the event of a change in control on December 31, 2009,2010, are the same as benefits payable in the event of death on the same date (as described above) with the following exceptions:
Named Executive Officers would have been entitled to a maximum IC award for 2009 (1602010 (200 percent of target), a maximum long-term incentive cash award under the2007-20092008-2010 performance cycle of the LTIP and a maximum prorated award under the2008-20102009-2011 and the2009-20112010-2012 performance cycles based on the number of full or partial months completed in the performance cycle. The maximum payout amounts are shown in the table above and would have been paid in a lump sum immediately following the change in control. All restricted stock would vest immediately.
Deferred compensation balances would have been paid as a single lump sum in cash from the “income account” and whole shares of the Company’s common stock from the “stock account” immediately following the change in control.
In addition, in the event of a change in control, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has the discretionary authority to provide the following additional benefits:
1) Immediate vesting of all unvested stock options. The value of unvested options that could have been immediately vested upon a change in control on December 31, 2009 for each Named Executive Officer was: M. C. Pigott $1,059,262; T. E. Plimpton $453,344; J. G. Cardillo $354,179; D. D. Sobic $208,539; R. E. Armstrong $153,011.
2) Increased Supplemental Retirement Benefits. If the Committee chooses to terminate the Supplemental Retirement Plan upon a change in control, the value of accrued benefits under the plan would be paid in a single lump sum immediately following the change in control. The additional Supplemental Retirement Plan benefits that would have been paid had the plan been terminated following a change in control on December 31, 2009, are as follows: M. C. Pigott $7,322,922; T. E. Plimpton $2,527,704; J. G. Cardillo $714,710; D. D. Sobic $560,373; R. E. Armstrong $413,485. For purposes of calculating the value of the benefit to be paid upon such a plan termination, the normal actuarial factors and assumptions used to determine “Actuarial Equivalent” under the qualified retirement plan will be used with the exception of the interest rate which will be zero percent.
| | |
| • | Immediate vesting of all unvested stock options. The value of unvested options that could have been immediately vested upon a change in control on December 31, 2010, for each Named Executive Officer was: M. C. Pigott $9,148,736; T. E. Plimpton $4,376,998; J. G. Cardillo $3,069,791; D. D. Sobic $1,870,858; R. J. Christensen $1,378,936. |
|
| • | Increased Supplemental Retirement Benefits. If the Committee chooses to terminate the Supplemental Retirement Plan upon a change in control, the value of accrued benefits under the plan would be paid in a single lump sum immediately following the change in control. The additional Supplemental Retirement Plan benefits that would have been paid had the plan been terminated following a change in control on December 31, 2010 are as follows: M. C. Pigott $6,572,216; T. E. Plimpton $2,185,876; J. G. Cardillo $1,205,216; D. D. Sobic $652,116; R. J. Christensen $803,948. For purposes of calculating the value of the benefit to be paid upon such a plan termination, the normal actuarial factors and assumptions used to determine “Actuarial Equivalent” under the qualified retirement plan will be used with the exception of the interest rate, which will be zero percent. |
28
independence of Ernst and Young LLP. The services provided for the year ended December 31, 2009,2010, and December 31, 2008,2009, are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (In millions) | | | (In millions) | |
| | 2009 | | 2008 | | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
|
Audit | | $ | 5.25 | | | $ | 4.91 | | | $ | 5.06 | | | $ | 5.25 | |
Audit-Related | | | .15 | | | | .20 | | | | .15 | | | | .15 | |
Tax | | | .12 | | | | .25 | | | | .37 | | | | .12 | |
All Other | | | .00 | | | | .00 | | | | .00 | | | | .00 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | $ | 5.58 | | | $ | 5.52 | |
| | $ | 5.52 | | | $ | 5.36 | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
29
Audit Fees
In the year ended December 31, 2009,2010, the independent auditors, Ernst & Young LLP, charged the Company $5.25$5.06 million for professional services rendered for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report onForm 10-K, audit of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, reviews of the financial statements included in the Company’s Quarterly Reports onForm 10-Q, and services provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings.
Audit-Related Fees
In the year ended December 31, 2009,2010, the independent auditors, Ernst & Young LLP, billed the Company $.15 million for audit-related professional services. These services include employee benefit plan (pension and 401(k)) audits and other assurance services not directly related to the audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Tax
In the year ended December 31, 2009,2010, the independent auditors, Ernst & Young LLP, billed the Company $.12$.37 million for tax services, which include fees for tax return preparation for the Company, consulting on audits and inquiries by taxing authorities and the effects that present and future transactions may have on the Company’s tax liabilities.
All Other Fees
In the year ended December 31, 2009,2010, Ernst & Young LLP was not engaged to perform professional services other than those authorized above.
3038
STOCKHOLDER RETURN PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The following line graph compares the yearly percentage change in the cumulative total stockholder return on the Company’s common stock to the cumulative total return of the Standard & Poor’s Composite 500 Stock Index and the return of the industry peer group of companies identified in the graph (the Peer Group Index) for the last five fiscal years ending December 31, 2009.2010. Standard & Poor’s has calculated a return for each company in the Peer Group Index weighted according to its respective capitalization at the beginning of each period with dividends reinvested on a monthly basis. Management believes that the identified companies and methodology used in the graph for the peer group indices provides a better comparison than other indices available. The Peer Group Index consists of Caterpillar Inc., Cummins Inc., Danaher Corporation, Deere & Company, Dover Corporation, Eaton Corporation, Harley-Davidson, Inc., Honeywell International Inc., Illinois Tool Works Inc., Ingersoll-Rand Company Ltd. and United Technologies Corporation. The comparison assumes that $100 was invested December 31, 20042005 in the Company’s common stock and in the stated indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2004 | | | 2005 | | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | 2005 | | | | 2006 | | | | 2007 | | | | 2008 | | | | 2009 | | | | 2010 | |
PACCAR Inc | | | | 100 | | | | | 89.58 | | | | | 131.71 | | | | | 170.96 | | | | | 91.71 | | | | | 118.42 | | | | | 100 | | | | | 147.02 | | | | | 190.84 | | | | | 102.37 | | | | | 132.19 | | | | | 212.01 | |
S&P 500 Index | | | | 100 | | | | | 104.91 | | | | | 121.48 | | | | | 128.16 | | | | | 80.74 | | | | | 102.11 | | | | | 100 | | | | | 115.79 | | | | | 122.16 | | | | | 76.96 | | | | | 97.33 | | | | | 111.99 | |
Peer Group Index | | | | 100 | | | | | 103.87 | | | | | 122.43 | | | | | 156.99 | | | | | 92.51 | | | | | 127.43 | | | | | 100 | | | | | 117.86 | | | | | 151.14 | | | | | 89.06 | | | | | 122.68 | | | | | 171.86 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
3139
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
The Company has been advised that threetwo stockholders intend to present proposals at the Annual Meeting. The Company will furnish the name, address and number of shares held by the proponent of each of the following stockholder proposals upon receipt of a request for such information to the Secretary.
In accordance with the proxy regulations, the following is the complete text of each proposal exactly as submitted.The stockholder proposals include some assertions the Company believes are incorrect. The Company has not addressed all of these inaccuracies. The Company accepts no responsibility for the proposalsproposals..
| |
ITEM 2:6: | STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING THE SUPERMAJORITY VOTING PROVISIONS |
Resolved: Shareholders request that our board take the steps necessary so that each shareholder voting requirement inimpacting our charter and bylaws,company that calls for a greater than simple majority vote be changed to a majority of the votes cast for and against the proposal in compliance with applicable laws.
Supporting Statement: CurrentlyCorporate governance procedures and practices, and the level of accountability they impose, are closely related to financial performance. Shareowners are willing to pay a 1%-minority can frustrate the willpremium for shares of our 66%-shareholder majority. Also our supermajority votecorporations that have excellent corporate governance. Supermajority voting requirements canhave been found to be almost impossible to obtain when one considers abstentions and broker non-votes. For example, a Goodyear (GT) management proposal for annual election of each director failed to pass even though 90% of votes cast were yes-votes. Supermajority requirementssix entrenching mechanisms that are arguably most often used to block initiatives supported by most shareowners but opposed by management.negatively related with company performance. See “What Matters in Corporate Governance?” Lucien Bebchuk, Alma Cohen & Allen Ferrell, Harvard Law School, Discussion Paper No. 491(09/2004,revised0312005).
FortunatelyThis proposal topic won from 74% to 88% support at the following companies: Weyerhaeuser, Alcoa, Waste Management, Goldman Sachs, FirstEnergy, McGraw-Hill and Macy’s. The proponents of these proposals included William Steiner, James McRitchie and Ray T. Chevedden. This proposal topic won majority support from independent shareholders at our poison pill expired in February 2009 and there is no current pill. However, the merits2010 annual meeting.
The merit of this Simple Majority Vote proposal should also be considered in the context of the need for further improvementsadditional improvement in our company’s 2010 reported corporate governance. For instance in 2009 the following governance issues were identified:status:
The Corporate Librarywww.thecorporatelibrary.com, an independent investment research firm, ratedsaid our company’s board was classified, which makes more difficult any attempt to gain control of a board majority. In addition, our company “Very High Concern” in Takeover Defenses. Our directors needed only one-vote out of 360 millionhad charter and bylaw provisions that would make it difficult for shareholders to be elected and then there were set for3-years – accountability concern.achieve control by enlarging the board or removing directors.
The Corporate Library said thereTwo insiders were a number of red flags related to our company’s pay practices foron the board including Principal Financial Officer (PFO) Thomas Plimpton and CEO Mark Pigott, who had $15.5 million in total realized pay in 2008. Mr. Pigott realized $10 millionwhose brother was on the exercise of options in 2008. With such a large number of options, small increases in our company’s share price can result in large financial awards.board, John Pigott. William Reed, had zero shares held after l2-years and was flagged for his board service with Washington Mutual when it filed bankruptcy.
With two insidersWhile no cash awards were earned for 2009 due to underperformance, our CEO’s pension increased by $1.2 million — called “back door” pay. Additionally, our company continued to have a long-term cash incentive based on a three-year performance period and the value of time- vested stock option awards was about 450% of our Board and an inside-related director on our board (James Pigott) we did not even have an Independent Chairman or a Lead Director. John Fluke, with25-years director tenure (independence concern), was on our key audit and executive pay committees.CEO’s base salary.
Our board was the only significant directorship for six directors. This statement incould indicate a significant lack of current transferable director experience for half of our 2009 proxy seems to be misleading or useless, “Stockholders may contact the Board of Directors by writing to: The Board of Directors ...PACCAR.Board@paccar.com.” John Chevedden, shareholder, sent an email regarding our directordirectors. Director Robert Parry having beenhad years of tenure on the infamous Countrywide Board of Directors. There was no material response after months of waiting and a reminder.board. Three directors were beyond age 70.
Three directors had 12 to 26 years tenure which would count against independence, including John Fluke who chaired our Nomination Committee.
We had no right to:to use cumulative voting, to call a special meeting, to act by written consent, elect directors based on a majority vote or to vote on our auditors.
Our directors served on boards rated “D” by The Corporate Library: Kirk Hachigian, Cooper Industries (CBE) and Robert Parry, Janus Capital (JNS). Six of our directors had no other current board service beyond PCAR and our full Board met only 4-times in an entire year – commitment concern. Director James Pigott is the uncle of CEO Mark Pigott and director John Pigott.
The above concerns shows there is need for improvement. Please encourage our board to respond positively to this proposal:
proposal in order to initiate improved governance and performance: Adopt Simple Majority Vote – Yes on 2.6.
3240
BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ RESPONSE
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OPPOSES THE PROPOSED RESOLUTION ANDUNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTEAGAINST ITEM 26 FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
PACCAR is committed to corporate governance policies and practices that enhance stockholder returns. Its conservative policies ensure that the Company is governed in accordance with the highest standards of integrity and in the best interest of its stockholders.
The Company’s governance practices and strong financial performance have delivered outstanding results to stockholders.
The Company has delivered an average annual return to stockholders of 19.123.0 percent versus the S&P 500 negative 1.0500’s 1.4 percent return in the last decade. The Company’s return to stockholders exceeded the S&P 500 for the previous one-, three-, five-, ten and twenty-year time periods. The Company’s governance structure positions the Company for profitable long-term growth and the benefit of its stockholders. M. C. Pigott exercised stock options that were grantedContrary to the proponent’s statement, Director William G. Reed, Jr., is a substantial long-term stockholder in 1999 and 2000 and were due to expire per LTIP agreement. M. C. Pigott personally purchased 150,000the Company who owns over 686,000 shares as reported on page 4 of Company stock in 2008.
this proxy statement.
The Company’s supermajority voting provisions ensure that a broad consensus of stockholders agree on significant corporate changes.
Under the Company’s existing governance documents, a “simple majority vote” applies to many matters submitted for stockholder approval. For significant corporate transactions, the Certificate of Incorporation provides that stockholders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding voting stock must approve the recommended action. Examples of these significant corporate transactions include the following:
| | |
| • | amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation; |
|
|
| • | the sale, lease or exchange of all or substantially all of the Company’s property and assets; |
|
|
| • | removal of directors or the entire Board; |
|
|
| • | the Company’s merger or consolidation with another entity; |
|
|
| • | dissolution of the Company; and |
|
|
| • | approval of a stockholder action to make, alter or repeal the bylaws. |
After careful consideration, the Board of Directors believes that the supermajority voting requirements are reasonable and appropriate for significant matters that affect the Company. The Company’s two-thirds supermajority vote provisions are designed to protect all PACCAR stockholders against coercive takeover tactics by requiring that a broad consensus of stockholders agree on significant corporate matters. Delaware law permits supermajority voting requirements and many publicly traded companies have adopted these provisions to preserve and maximize value for all stockholders.
The supermajority voting provisions protect PACCAR stockholders against the actions of short-term investors such as hedge funds or corporate raiders.
If a simple majority vote standard were adopted, and only 50.1 percent of the shares are present at a stockholders’ meeting, a minority of stockholders representing as little as 25.1 percent of the outstanding voting power of the Company could approve corporate changes that may be damaging to the long-term interest
33
of the majority of Company stockholders. The Board of Directors believes that more meaningful supermajority voting requirements are appropriate for issues that have a long-lasting effect on the Company.
The supermajority voting provisions are in the best interest of PACCAR stockholders because they increase stability, improve long-term planning and represent a more comprehensive group of stockholdersstockholders..
The current voting provisions encourage persons or firms making unsolicited takeover bids to negotiate with the Board to ensure that the interests of all the Company’s stockholders are considered. In addition, the
41
supermajority provisions allow the Board to consider alternative proposals that maximize the value of the Company for all stockholders.
The Board of Directors believes that the Company benefits from the existing supermajority vote requirement because it enhances corporate stability and enables the Board to pursue corporate strategies for the benefit of all stockholders. Major steps such as the sale, merger or dissolution of the Company should have the support of a supermajority of the stockholders.
PACCAR stockholders approved the supermajority provisions in 1986 by a vote of 78 percent of the outstanding shares. The Board of Directors believes that the existing two-thirds voting requirement is reasonable and appropriate to maximize value for all stockholders.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTEAGAINST ITEM 2.6.
| |
ITEM 3:7: | STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING A DIRECTOR VOTE THRESHOLD |
Resolved: That the shareholders of PACCAR Inc. (“Company”) hereby request that the Board of Directors initiate the appropriate process to amend the Company’s corporate governance documents (articles(certificate of incorporation or bylaws) to provide that director nominees shall be elected by the affirmative vote of the majority of votes cast at an annual meeting of shareholders, with a plurality vote standard retained for contested director elections, that is, when the number of director nominees exceeds the number of board seats.
Supporting Statement: InPACCAR’s Board of Directors should establish a majority vote standard in director elections in order to provide shareholders a meaningful role in director elections, the Company’s director election vote standard should be changed to a majority vote standard. Athese important elections. The proposed majority vote standard would requirerequires that a director nominee receive a majority of the votes cast in an election in order to be formally elected. The standard is particularly well-suitedwell suited for the vast majority of director elections in which only board nominated candidates are on the ballot. We believe that a majority vote standard in board elections would establish a challenging vote standard for board nominees and improveUnder the performance of individual directors and entire boards. The Company presently uses a plurality vote standard in all director elections. Under thecurrent plurality standard, a board nominee can be elected with as little as a single affirmative vote, even if a substantial majority of the votes cast are “withheld” from the nominee.
In response to strong shareholder support for We believe that a majority vote standard in board elections establishes a strongchallenging vote standard for board nominees, enhances board accountability, and improves the performance of boards and individual directors.
Over the past five years, a significant majority of companies in the nation’s leading companies, including Intel, General Electric, Motorola, Hewlett Packard, Morgan Stanley, Home Depot, Gannett, Marathon Oil, and Pfizer, haveS&P 500 Index has adopted a majority vote standard in company bylaws, or articles of incorporation. Additionally, theseincorporation, or charter. These companies have also adopted a director resignation policies in their bylaws or corporate governance policiespolicy that establishes a board-centric post-election process to address post-election issues related todetermine the status of any director nomineesnominee that failis not elected. This dramatic move to win election. Other companies have responded only partially to the call for change by simply adopting post election director resignation policies that set procedures for addressing the status of director nominees that receive more “withhold” votes than “for” votes. At the time of this proposal submission, PACCAR and its board had not taken either action.
We believe that a post election director resignation policy without a majority vote standard is in company governance documents is an inadequate reform.direct response to strong shareholder demand for a meaningful role in director elections.
PACCAR’s Board of Directors has/not acted to establish a majority vote standard, retaining its plurality vote standard, despite the fact that many of its self-identified peer companies including Cummins, Inc., Deere & Company, and Eaton Corporation have adopted majority voting. The Board should take this critical first step in establishing aa. meaningful majority vote policy is the adoption of a majority vote standard. With a majority vote standard in place, the boardBoard can then take actionact to developadopt a post election proceduredirector resignation policy to address the status of directors that fail to win election.unelected directors. A majority vote standard combined with a post electionpost-election director resignation policy would establish a
34
meaningful right for shareholders to elect directors and reserveat PACCAR, while reserving for the boardBoard an important post electionpost-election role in determining the continued status of an unelected director. We urge the Board to take this important step of establishingjoin the mainstream major U.S. companies and establish a majority vote standard in the Company’s governance documents.standard.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ RESPONSE
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OPPOSES THE PROPOSED RESOLUTION ANDUNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTEAGAINST ITEM 37 FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
One of the primary strengths of PACCAR is the continuity of vision and quality performance that have resulted from the diligent and positive manner in which the directors guide the Company. PACCAR stockholders have benefited from the outstanding leadership the Board of Directors has provided the Company
42
for many years. The Company has delivered an average annual return to stockholders of 19.123.0 percent versus the S&P 500 negative 1.0500’s 1.4 percent return in the last decade.
The Company has an excellent history of electing Board directors by a substantial majority.
| | |
| • | For each of the past fivesix years, the Company has received a similar proposal, and each year the proposal received less than a majority of the votes cast by stockholders. |
|
|
| • | Every director nominee has received an affirmative vote greater than 8784 percent of the shares voted through the plurality process during the previous 2021 years. The proponent’s statement that a director may be elected by a single vote even if a substantial majority of the votes cast are “withheld,” is improbable –— especially in light of the Company’s past voting results. The Company’s stockholders have an excellent history of electing strong and independent directors by plurality voting. |
|
|
| • | For 20 consecutive years, over 88 percent of the outstanding shares have been represented at the Company’s annual meeting. |
|
|
| • | The Company’s Nominating and Governance Committee has a thorough and proven director selection process to identify strong nominees committed to serving the Company and its stockholders. |
|
|
| • | The Company has a governance policy that requires a director to submit a resignation to the Board upon a change in principal employment or responsibility. This policy provides additional assurance that Board directors are of the highest caliber to serve stockholders during their term. |
A plurality voting standard is an accepted method among public companies and is the standard voting practice under the laws of the State of Delaware.
| | |
| • | The rules governing plurality voting are well understood by stockholders. In plurality voting for the election of directors, the nominees with the most votes are elected. By contrast, in a majority voting system, the result is uncertain if one or more of the director nominees fails to receive a majority of the votes cast. |
|
|
| • | The Board believes electing directors under a plurality vote process is best for the ongoing success of the Company and its stockholders, but it will continue to review the majority vote standard. |
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTEAGAINST ITEM 3.
| |
ITEM 4: | STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING COMPOSITION OF COMPENSATION COMMITTEE |
Resolved: The shareholders of PACCAR Inc. (the “Company”) request that the Board of Directors (the “Board”) adopt a policy prohibiting any current or former chief executive officers of public companies from
35
serving on the Board’s Compensation Committee. The policy shall be implemented so that it does not affect the unexpired terms of previously elected directors.
Supporting Statement: It is a well-established tenet of corporate governance that a compensation committee must be independent of management to ensure fair and impartial negotiations of pay with individual executives. Indeed, this principle is reflected in the listing standards of the major stock exchanges.
We do not dispute that CEOs can be valuable members of other Board committees. Nonetheless, we believe that shareholder concerns about aligning CEO pay with performance argue strongly in favor of directors who can view senior executive compensation issues objectively. We are particularly concerned about CEOs on the Compensation Committee because of their potential conflicts of interest in setting the compensation of their peers.
We believe that CEOs who benefit from generous pay will view large compensation packages as necessary to retain and motivate other executives. In our view, those who benefit from stock option plans will view them as an efficient form of compensation; those who receive generous “golden parachutes” will regard them as a key element of a compensation package. Consequently, we are concerned that the inclusion of CEOs on the Compensation Committee may result in more generous pay packages for senior executives than that necessary to attract and retain talent.
In their 2004 book “Pay Without Performance,”law professors Lucian Bebchuk and Jesse Fried cite an academic study by Brian Main, Charles O’Reilly and James Wade that found a significant association between the compensation level of outsiders on the compensation committee and CEO pay.
“There are still plenty of CEOs who sit on compensation committees at other companies,” said Carol Bowie, a corporate governance expert at RiskMetrics Group. “They don’t have an interest in seeing CEO pay go down.” (Crain’s Chicago Business, May 26, 2008.)
Executive compensation expert Graef Crystal concurs. “My own research of CEOs who sit on compensation committees shows that the most highly paid executives award the fattest packages to the CEOs whose pay they regulate. Here’s an even better idea: bar CEOs from serving on the comp committee.” (Bloomberg News column, June 22, 2009.)
Moreover, CEOs “indirectly benefit from one another’s pay increases because compensation packages are often based on surveys detailing what their peers are earning.” (The New York Times, May 24, 2006.)
At our Company, Chairman and CEO Mark C. Pigott received $11.9 million in total compensation in 2008 including the grant date fair value of equity-based awards. This represents a 29 percent pay increase over 2007 despite that we believe to be the Company’s poor performance, both in absolute terms and relative to its peers. Four of the five directors on the Compensation Committee, including its chairman, are either current or retired CEOs.
We urge you to vote FOR this proposal.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ RESPONSE
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OPPOSES THE PROPOSED RESOLUTION ANDUNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTEAGAINST ITEM 4 FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
The Company has delivered superior returns to stockholders.
| | |
| • | The Company’s Compensation Committee exercises effective, independent oversight of executive compensation. The proponent’s assertion that members of the Company’s Compensation Committee have a conflict of interest merely for past or present service as a public company chief executive officer (CEO) is baseless. |
|
|
| • | The shareholder proposal is inaccurate, biased and misleading. PACCAR’s financial performance was excellent in 2008, as the Company earned $1.02 billion, the fourth best year in its104-year history. |
36
| | |
| | PACCAR stockholder performance versus its peer group for the five-year period ending in 2008 was also excellent in absolute and relative terms. |
| | |
| • | In the January 2010Harvard Business Review,PACCAR’s CEO, Mark Pigott, was honored as one of the 50 best performing CEOs in the world as measured by long-term total stockholder returns. M. C. Pigott personally purchased 150,000 shares of Company stock in 2008. |
|
|
| • | PACCAR executives do not have golden parachutes or employment contracts. |
|
|
| • | The Conference Board 2009 Task Force Report on Executive Compensation provides guidelines for the composition of Compensation Committees. Members must be independent and be knowledgeable about the company’s business. The Company’s Compensation Committee members meet these guidelines. |
Committee members are independent and experienced.
Each of the Company’s Compensation Committee members meets the director independence standards of NASDAQ and of IRS Section 162(m). None of the Committee members has any personal or material business relationship with the Company. The companies of the CEOs who serve on PACCAR’s Compensation Committee do not include PACCAR in their peer group in determining their own compensation. Compensation Committee members have no personal interest in increasing the pay of the Company CEO.
Committee members are knowledgeable about the Company’s business.
The Committee maintains a compensation program that reflects the incentives appropriate for a company in a capital goods business. The Company’s compensation program is straightforward, provides performance-based incentives, minimizes risk and has delivered excellent stockholder returns.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTEAGAINST ITEM 4.7.
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS AND DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS FOR 20112012
A stockholder proposal must be addressed to the Corporate Secretary and received at the principal executive offices of the Company, P.O. Box 1518, Bellevue, Washington 98009, by the close of business on November 12, 2010,2011, to be considered for inclusion in the proxy materials for the Company’s 20112012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
For business to be brought before the Annual Meeting of Stockholders by a stockholder, other than those proposals included in the proxy materials, the Company’s Bylaws (Art. III, Section 5) provide that notice of such business, including director nominations, must be received at the Company’s principal executive offices not less than 90 nor more than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the prior year’s annual meeting. The notice must include the information stated in the Bylaws. A copy of the pertinent Bylaw provision is available on request to the Corporate Secretary, PACCAR Inc, P.O. Box 1518, Bellevue, Washington 98009.
OTHER BUSINESS
The Company knows of no other business likely to be brought before the meeting.
J. M. D’Amato
Secretary
March 10, 20102011
3743
Appendix A
PACCAR Inc
LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
ARTICLE 1. INTRODUCTION.
The Plan was first adopted by the Board on February 11, 1991 and approved by the Company’s stockholders in 1991. Amendments to the Plan were approved by the stockholders in 1997, 2002 and 2006. The purpose of the Plan is to promote the long term success of the Company and the creation of stockholder value by (a) encouraging Key Employees to focus on critical long range objectives, (b) encouraging the attraction and retention of Key Employees with exceptional qualifications, and (c) linking Key Employees directly to stockholder interests through increased stock ownership. The Plan seeks to achieve this purpose by providing for Awards in the form of Restricted Shares, Stock Units, Options (which may constitute incentive stock options or nonstatutory stock options), stock appreciation rights, or cash. The Plan shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington.
ARTICLE 2. ADMINISTRATION.
2.1 Committee Composition. The Plan shall be administered by the Committee. The Committee shall consist exclusively of three or more directors of the Company, who meet the independence requirements of NASDAQ and the Securities and Exchange Commission and shall be appointed by the Board. In addition, the composition of the Committee shall satisfy:
(a) Such requirements as the Securities and Exchange Commission may establish for administrators acting under plans intended to qualify for exemption underRule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act (as amended from time to time); and
(b) Such requirements as the Internal Revenue Service may establish for outside directors acting under plans intended to qualify for exemption under Section 162(m)(4)(C) of the Code (as amended from time to time).
2.2 Committee Responsibilities. The Committee shall (a) select the Key Employees who are to receive Awards under the Plan, (b) determine the type, number, vesting requirements, and other conditions of such Awards, (c) interpret the Plan, and (d) make all other decisions relating to the operation of the Plan. The Committee may adopt such rules or guidelines as it deems appropriate to implement the Plan. The Committee’s determinations under the Plan shall be final and binding on all persons.
ARTICLE 3. SHARES AVAILABLE FOR GRANTS.
Any Common Shares issued pursuant to the Plan may be authorized but unissued shares or treasury shares. The aggregate number of Restricted Shares, Stock Units, SARs, and Options awarded under the Plan shall not exceed 45,562,500 If any Restricted Shares, Stock Units, or Options are forfeited or if any Options terminate for any other reason before being exercised, then the Common Shares covered by such Restricted Shares, Stock Units or Options shall again become available for Awards under the Plan. However, if Options are surrendered upon the exercise of related SARs, then such Options shall not be restored to the pool available for Awards. The limitation of this Article 3 shall be subject to adjustment pursuant to Article 10.
ARTICLE 4. ELIGIBILITY.
Only Key Employees shall be eligible for designation as Participants. A Key Employee who owns more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of outstanding stock of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries shall not be eligible for the grant of an ISO unless the requirements set forth in Section 422(c)(5) of the Code are satisfied.
A-1
ARTICLE 5. OPTIONS.
5.1 Stock Option Agreement. Each grant of an Option under the Plan shall be evidenced by a Stock Option Agreement between the Optionee and the Company. Such Option shall be subject to all applicable terms of the Plan and may be subject to any other terms that are not inconsistent with the Plan. The Stock Option Agreement shall specify whether the Option is an ISO or a NSO. The provisions of the various Stock Option Agreements entered into under the Plan need not be identical.
5.2 Transferability. No Option granted under the Plan shall be transferable by the Optionee other than by will, or by a beneficiary designation executed by the Optionee and delivered to the Company, or by the laws of descent and distribution unless the Committee provides otherwise in a nonstatutory stock option agreement. An Option may be exercised during the lifetime of the Optionee only by him or her or by his or her guardian or legal representative unless the Committee provides otherwise in a nonstatutory Stock Option Agreement. No Option or interest therein may be assigned, pledged, or hypothecated by the Optionee during his or her lifetime, whether by operation of law or otherwise, or be made subject to execution, attachment or similar process.
5.3 Number of Shares. Each Stock Option Agreement shall specify the number of Common Shares subject to the Option provided that the maximum number of Common Shares awarded to any participant in any year shall be 1,265,625 (subject to adjustment in accordance with Article 10). The Stock Option Agreement shall provide for the adjustment of such number including the maximum number in accordance with Article 10.
5.4 Exercise Price. Each Stock Option Agreement shall specify the Exercise Price. The Exercise Price under an Option shall not be less than the closing price of a Common Share on the date of grant. Subject to adjustment pursuant to Section 10, the Exercise Price of outstanding Options fixed by the Committee shall not be modified.
5.5 Exercisability and Term. Each Stock Option Agreement shall specify the date when all or any installment of the Option is to become exercisable. The Stock Option Agreement shall also specify the term of the Option; provided that the term of an ISO shall in no event exceed 10 years from the date of grant. A Stock Option Agreement may provide for accelerated exercisability in the event of the Optionee’s death, disability or retirement and may provide for expiration prior to the end of its term in the event of the termination of the Optionee’s service. NSOs may also be awarded in combination with Restricted Shares or Stock Units, and such an Award may provide that the NSOs will not be exercisable unless the related Restricted Shares or Stock Units are forfeited.
5.6 Effect of Change in Control. The Committee may determine, at the time of granting an Option or thereafter, that such Option (and any SARs included therein) shall become fully exercisable as to all Common Shares subject to such Option in the event that a Change in Control occurs with respect to the Company. If the Committee finds that there is a reasonable possibility that, within the next six months, a Change in Control will occur with respect to the Company, then the Committee may determine that all outstanding Options (and any SARs included therein) shall become fully exercisable as to all Common Shares subject to such Options.
5.7 Modification or Assumption of Options. Within the limitations of the Plan, and to the extent that it does not cause the Option to be subject to Section 409A of the Code, the Committee may modify, extend or assume outstanding Options provided it is consistent with Section 5.4. The foregoing notwithstanding, no modification of an Option shall, without the consent of the Optionee, alter or impair his or her rights or obligations under such Option.
A-2
ARTICLE 6. PAYMENT FOR OPTION SHARES.
6.1 General Rule. The entire Exercise Price of Common Shares issued upon exercise of Options shall be payable in cash at the time when such Common Shares are purchased, except as follows:
(a) In the case of an ISO granted under the Plan, payment shall be made only pursuant to the express provisions of the applicable Stock Option Agreement. The Stock Option Agreement may specify that payment may be made in any form(s) described in this Article 6.
(b) In the case of an NSO, the Committee may at any time accept payment in any form(s) described in this Article 6.
6.2 Surrender of Stock. To the extent that this Section 6.2 is applicable, payment for all or any part of the Exercise Price may be made with Common Shares which have already been owned by the Optionee for a sufficient period to avoid any adverse accounting treatment. Such Common Shares shall be valued at their Fair Market Value on the date when the new Common Shares are purchased under the Plan.
6.3 Exercise/Sale. To the extent that this Section 6.3 is applicable, payment may be made by the delivery (on a form prescribed by the Company) of an irrevocable direction to a securities broker approved by the Company to sell Common Shares and to deliver all or part of the sales proceeds to the Company in payment of all or part of the Exercise Price and any withholding taxes.
6.4 Exercise/Pledge. To the extent that this Section 6.4 is applicable, payment may be made by the delivery (on a form prescribed by the Company) of an irrevocable direction to pledge Common Shares to a securities broker or lender approved by the Company, as security for a loan, and to deliver all or part of the loan proceeds to the Company in payment of all or part of the Exercise Price and any withholding taxes.
6.5 Promissory Note. To the extent that this Section 6.5 is applicable, payment for all or any part of the Exercise Price may be made with a full-recourse promissory note; provided that the par value of newly issued Common Shares must be paid in lawful money of the U.S. at the time when such Common Shares are purchased.
6.6 Other Forms of Payment. To the extent that this Section 6.6 is applicable, payment may be made in any other form that is consistent with applicable laws, regulations, and rules.
ARTICLE 7. STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS.
7.1 Grant of SARs. Each Option granted under the Plan may include a SAR. The maximum number of SARs that may be awarded to any participant in any year shall be 1,265,625 (subject to adjustment in accordance with Article 10). Such SAR shall entitle the Optionee (or any person having the right to exercise the Option after the Optionee’s death) to surrender to the Company, unexercised, all or any part of that portion of the Option which then is exercisable and to receive from the Company Common Shares or cash, or a combination of Common Shares and cash, as the Committee shall determine. If a SAR is exercised, the number of Common Shares remaining subject to the related Option shall be reduced accordingly, and vice versa. The amount of cashand/or the Fair Market Value of Common Shares received upon exercise of a SAR shall, in the aggregate, be equal to the amount by which the Fair Market Value (on the date of surrender) of the Common Shares subject to the surrendered portion of the Option exceeds the Exercise Price. In no event shall any SAR be exercised if such Fair Market Value does not exceed the Exercise Price. A SAR may be included in an ISO only at the time of grant but may be included in a NSO at the time of grant or at any subsequent time.
7.2 Exercise of SARs. A SAR may be exercised to the extent that the Option in which it is included is exercisable, subject to any restrictions imposed byRule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act (as amended from time to time). If, on the date when an Option expires, the Exercise Price under such Option is less than the Fair Market Value on such date but any portion of such Option has not been exercised or surrendered, then any SAR included in such Option shall automatically be deemed to be exercised as of such date with respect to
A-3
such portion. An Option granted under the Plan may provide that it will be exercisable as a SAR only in the event of a Change in Control.
ARTICLE 8. RESTRICTED SHARES AND STOCK UNITS.
8.1 Time, Amount, and Form of Awards. Restricted Shares or Stock Units with respect to an Award Year may be granted during such Award Year or at any time thereafter. Awards under the Plan may be granted in the form of Restricted Shares, in the form of Stock Units, or in any combination of both. Restricted Shares or Stock Units may also be awarded in combination with NSOs, and such an Award may provide that the Restricted Shares or Stock Units will be forfeited in the event that the related NSOs are exercised. The maximum number of Restricted Sharesand/or Stock Units, awarded to any participant in any year shall be 450,000 (subject to adjustment in accordance with Article 10). The Stock Award Agreement shall provide for the adjustment of such number including the maximum number in accordance with Article 10.
8.2 Performance Based Awards. The Committee may authorize that Awards of Restricted Shares and Stock Units be made subject to or granted upon the attainment of specified performance goals over a designated performance period of at least one year in addition to time-vesting and other vesting requirements. If so authorized, Awards intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Code Section 162(m) shall be made in accordance with the requirements thereof. Performance goals for this purpose will be based on objective criteria specifically defined by the Committee on a Company, business unit or peer group comparison basis, which may include or exclude specified items of an unusual or nonrecurring nature and are based on one or more of the following: earnings per share, net income, return on assets, return on net assets, return on sales, return on capital, return on equity, return on revenue, cash flow, cost reduction, total shareholder return, economic value added, cash flow return on investment, and cash value added. The Committee, in its sole discretion, may reduce or eliminate any Award otherwise earned based on an assessment of individual performance, but in no event may any such reduction result in an increase of the Award payable to any other participant. The Committee shall determine the amount of any such reduction by taking into account such factors as it deems relevant including, without limitation: (a) performance against other financial or strategic objectives; (b) its subjective assessment of the executive’s overall performance for the year; and (c) prevailing levels of total compensation among similar companies.
8.3 Vesting Conditions. Each Award of Restricted Shares or Stock Units shall become vested, in full or in installments, upon satisfaction of the conditions specified in the Stock Award Agreement. A Stock Award Agreement may provide for accelerated vesting in the event of the Participant’s death, disability, or retirement. The Committee may determine, at the time of making an Award or thereafter, that such Award shall become fully vested in the event that a Change in Control occurs with respect to the Company.
8.4 Form and Time of Settlement of Stock Units. Settlement of vested Stock Units may be made in the form of cash, in the form of Common Shares, or in any combination of both. Methods of converting Stock Units into cash may include (without limitation) a method based on the average Fair Market Value of Common Shares over a series of trading days. Vested Stock Units may be settled in a lump sum or in installments. The distribution may occur or commence when all vesting conditions applicable to the Stock Units have been satisfied or have lapsed, or it may be deferred to any later date consistent with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code if subject to Section 409A of the Code. The amount of a deferred distribution may be increased by an interest factor or by dividend equivalents. Until an Award of Stock Units is settled, the number of such Stock Units shall be subject to adjustment pursuant to Article 10.
8.5 Death of Recipient. Any Stock Units Award that becomes payable after the recipient’s death shall be distributed to the recipient’s beneficiary or beneficiaries. Each recipient of a Stock Units Award under the Plan shall designate one or more beneficiaries for this purpose by filing the prescribed form with the Company. A beneficiary designation may be changed by filing the prescribed form with the Company at any time before the Award recipient’s death. If no beneficiary was designated or if no designated beneficiary survives the Award recipient, then any Stock Units Award that becomes payable after the recipient’s death shall be distributed to the recipient’s estate.
A-4
8.6 Creditors’ Rights. A holder of Stock Units shall have no rights other than those of a general creditor of the Company. Stock Units represent an unfunded and unsecured obligation of the Company, subject to the terms and conditions of the applicable Stock Award Agreement.
ARTICLE 9. VOTING AND DIVIDEND RIGHTS.
9.1 Restricted Shares. The holders of Restricted Shares awarded under the Plan shall have the same voting, dividend, and other rights as the Company’s other stockholders. Cash dividends on Restricted Shares reinvested in additional Restricted Shares and any stock dividends paid on Restricted Shares shall be subject to the same conditions and restrictions as the Award with respect to which the dividends were paid. Such additional Restricted Shares shall not reduce the number of Common Shares available under Article 3.
9.2 Stock Units. The holders of Stock Units shall have no voting rights. Prior to settlement or forfeiture, any Stock Unit awarded under the Plan shall carry with it a right to dividend equivalents. Such right entitles the holder to be credited with an amount equal to all cash dividends paid on one Common Share while the Stock Unit is outstanding. Dividend equivalents may be converted into additional Stock Units. Settlement of dividend equivalents may be made in the form of cash, in the form of Common Shares, or in a combination of both. Prior to distribution, any dividend equivalents which are not paid shall be subject to the same conditions and restrictions as the Stock Units to which they attach.
ARTICLE 10. PROTECTION AGAINST DILUTION.
10.1 Adjustments. In the event of a subdivision of the outstanding Common Shares, a declaration of a dividend payable in Common Shares, a declaration of a dividend payable in a form other than Common Shares in an amount that has a material effect on the price of Common Shares, a combination or consolidation of the outstanding Common Shares (by reclassification or otherwise) into a lesser number of Common Shares, a recapitalization, a spin-off or a similar occurrence, the Committee shall make appropriate adjustments in one or more of (a) the number of Common Shares authorized, Options, Restricted Shares, and Stock Units, SARs available for future Awards under Article 3, (b) the number of Stock Units included in any prior Award which has not yet been settled, (c) the number of Common Shares covered by each outstanding Option Award , (d) the Exercise Price under each outstanding Option and SAR, or (e) the per person per year limitations on Awards under the Plan. Except as provided in this Article 10, a Participant shall have no rights by reason of any issue by the Company of stock of any class or securities convertible into stock of any class, any subdivision or consolidation of shares of stock of any class, the payment of any stock dividend or any other increase or decrease in the number of shares of stock of any class.
10.2 Reorganizations. In the event that the Company is a party to a merger or other reorganization, outstanding Options, Restricted Shares, and Stock Units shall be subject to the agreement of merger or reorganization. Such agreement may provide, without limitation, for the assumption of outstanding Awards by the surviving corporation or its parent, for their continuation by the Company (if the Company is a surviving corporation), for accelerated vesting, or for settlement in cash.
ARTICLE 11. LONG TERM PERFORMANCE CASH AWARDS.
11.1 The Committee may grant long term performance cash awards to any Participant in its sole discretion. Payment of cash awards will be based on the attainment of specified performance goals over a designated performance period in excess of one year. Performance awards for the Chief Executive Officer, the other covered employees within the meaning of Code Section 162(m) of the Company and such other senior executives as designated by the Committee are intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Code Section 162(m) and shall be made in accordance with the requirements thereof. Performance goals for this purpose will be based on objective criteria specifically defined by the Committee on a Company, business unit or peer group comparison basis, which may include or exclude specified items of an unusual or nonrecurring nature and are based on one or more of the following: earnings per share, net income, return on assets, return on net assets, return on sales, return on capital, return on equity, return on revenue, cash flow,
A-5
cost reduction, total shareholder return, economic value added, cash flow return on investment, and cash value added.
11.2 The Committee, in its sole discretion, may reduce or eliminate any award otherwise earned based on an assessment of individual performance, but in no event may any such reduction result in an increase of the award payable to any other Participant. The Committee shall determine the amount of any such reduction by taking into account such factors as it deems relevant including, without limitation: (a) performance against other financial or strategic objectives; (b) its subjective assessment of the executive’s overall performance for the year; and (c) prevailing levels of total compensation among similar companies. The maximum amount that may be paid to any eligible Participant in any year with respect to a long term performance cash award is $6,500,000.
11.3 In the event of a Change of Control of the Company, each Participant will be entitled to the maximum prorated award based on the number of full or partial months completed prior to the Change of Control during the performance period in which the Change of Control occurs. Each participant shall be entitled to be paid the sums in his deferred incomeand/or stock account on the earliest date permitted by law.
11.4 The Company may grant long term performance awards under other plans or programs consistent with the limitations described in Article 11. Such awards and all stock units credited under the Company’s Deferred Incentive Compensation Plan and Deferred Compensation Plan may be settled in the form of Common Shares issued under this Plan. Such Common Shares shall be treated for all purposes under the Plan like Common Shares issued in settlement of Stock Units and shall reduce the number of Common Shares available under Article 3.
11.5 The Committee may permit the deferral of any award and may permit payment on deferrals to be made in cash or shares of Common Stock subject to rules and procedures it may establish which shall comply with Section 409A of the Code for deferrals subject to Section 409A of the Code. These rules may include provisions for crediting dividend equivalents on deferred stock unit accounts and crediting interest on deferred cash accounts.
ARTICLE 12. LIMITATION ON RIGHTS.
12.1 Employment Rights. Neither the Plan nor any Award granted under the Plan shall be deemed to give any individual a right to remain an employee of the Company or a Subsidiary. The Company and its Subsidiaries reserve the right to terminate the service of any employee at any time, with or without cause, subject only to a written employment agreement (if any).
12.2 Stockholders’ Rights. A Participant shall have no dividend rights, voting rights, or other rights as a stockholder with respect to any Common Shares covered by his or her Award prior to the issuance of the stock, except as expressly provided in Section 9.1. No adjustment shall be made for cash dividends or other rights for which the record date is prior to the date when such certificate is issued, except as expressly provided in Articles 8, 9, and 10.
12.3 Regulatory Requirements. Any other provision of the Plan notwithstanding, the obligation of the Company to issue Common Shares under the Plan shall be subject to all applicable laws, rules and regulations, and such approval by any regulatory body as may be required. The Company reserves the right to restrict, in whole or in part, the delivery of Common Shares pursuant to any Award prior to the satisfaction of all legal requirements relating to the issuance of such Common Shares, to their registration, qualification or listing, or to an exemption from registration, qualification or listing.
ARTICLE 13. WITHHOLDING TAXES.
13.1 General. To the extent required by applicable federal, state, local, or foreign law, the recipient of any payment or distribution under the Plan shall make arrangements satisfactory to the Company for the satisfaction of any withholding tax obligations that arise by reason of the receipt or vesting of such payment or distribution. The Company shall not be required to issue any Common Shares or make any cash payment under the Plan until such obligations are satisfied.
A-6
13.2 Share Withholding. The Committee may permit the recipient of any payment or distribution under the Plan to satisfy his or her minimum tax withholding obligations by having the Company withhold a portion of any Common Shares that otherwise would be issued to him or her or by surrendering a portion of any Common Shares that previously were issued to him or her. Such Common Shares shall be valued at their Fair Market Value on the date when taxes otherwise would be withheld in cash. Any payment of taxes by assigning Common Shares to the Company may be subject to restrictions, including any restrictions required by rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
ARTICLE 14. ASSIGNMENT OR TRANSFER OF AWARDS.
Except as provided in Article 13 and Section 5.2, any Award granted under the Plan shall not be anticipated, assigned, attached, garnished, optioned, transferred, or made subject to any creditor’s process, whether voluntarily, involuntarily, or by operation of law. Any act in violation of this Article 14 shall be void. However, this Article 14 shall not preclude a Participant from designating a beneficiary who will receive any undistributed Awards in the event of the Participant’s death, nor shall it preclude a transfer by will or by the laws of descent and distribution. In addition, neither this Article 14 nor any other provision of the Plan shall preclude a Participant from transferring or assigning Restricted Shares or Stock Units to (a) the trustee of a trust that is revocable by such Participant alone, both at the time of the transfer or assignment and at all times thereafter prior to such Participant’s death, or (b) the trustee of any other trust to the extent approved in advance by the Committee in writing. A transfer or assignment of Restricted Shares or Stock Units from such trustee to any person other than such Participant shall be permitted only to the extent approved in advance by the Committee in writing, and Restricted Shares or Stock Units held by such trustee shall be subject to all of the conditions and restrictions set forth in the Plan and in the applicable Stock Award Agreement, as if such trustee were a party to such Agreement.
ARTICLE 15. FUTURE OF THE PLAN.
15.1 Term of the Plan. The Plan shall remain in effect until it is terminated under Section 15.2, except that no ISOs shall be granted after December 6, 2020.
15.2 Amendment or Termination. The Board may, at any time and for any reason, amend or terminate the Plan. An amendment of the Plan shall be subject to the approval of the Company’s stockholders only to the extent required by applicable laws, regulations, or rules. No Awards shall be granted under the Plan after the termination thereof. The termination of the Plan, or any amendment thereof, shall not affect any Option previously granted under the Plan.
ARTICLE 16. DEFINITIONS.
16.1 “Award” means any award of an Option (with or without a related SAR), a Restricted Share, a Stock Unit or a long term performance cash award under the Plan.
16.2 “Award Year” means a fiscal year with respect to which an Award may be granted
16.3 “Board” means the Company’s Board of Directors, as constituted from time to time.
16.4 “Change in Control” means the occurrence of any of the following events:
(i) The acquisition by any individual, entity or group (within the meaning of Sections 13(d)(3) or 14(d)(2) of the Exchange Act) (a “Person”) of beneficial ownership (within the meaning ofRule 13d-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act) of 15% or more of either (i) the then outstanding Common Shares (the “Outstanding Company Common Stock”) or (y) the combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities of the Company entitled to vote generally in the election of directors (the “Outstanding Company Voting Securities”); provided, however, that the following acquisitions shall not constitute a Change in Control: (i) any acquisition directly from the Company, (ii) any acquisition by the Company, (iii) any acquisition by an employee benefit plan (or related trust) sponsored or maintained by the Company or any corporation controlled by the Company, (iv) any acquisition by the natural children and grandchildren of Paul Pigott and Theiline McCone Pigott (the “Immediate Pigott Family”), any trust or
A-7
foundation to which any of the foregoing has transferred or may transfer securities of the Company, the trusts at Bank America Corporation or its successor, holding outstanding Common Shares for descendants of Paul Pigott and Theiline McCone Pigott, any trust established for the primary benefit of any member of the Immediate Pigott Family or any of their respective heirs or legatees, any trust of which any member of the Immediate Pigott Family serves as a trustee (or any affiliate or associate (within the meaning ofRule 12b-2 promulgated under the Exchange Act) of any of the foregoing) (the “Exempted Interests”), or (e) any acquisition by any corporation pursuant to a transaction described in clauses (A), (B) and (C) of subsection (iii) below;
(ii) Individuals who, as of the date this Plan is approved by the Company’s stockholders, constitute the Board (the “Incumbent Board”) cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the Board; provided, however, that any individual becoming a director subsequent to the date hereof whose nomination for election by the Company’s stockholders was approved by a vote of at least a majority of the directors then comprising the Incumbent Board shall be considered as though such individual were a member of the Incumbent Board, but excluding, for this purpose, any such individual whose initial assumption of office occurs as a result of an actual or threatened election contest with respect to the election or removal of directors or other actual or threatened solicitation of proxies or consents by or on behalf of a Person other than the Board;
(iii) The consummation of a reorganization, merger, share exchange, or consolidation (a “Business Combination”), in each case unless, following such Business Combination, (A) all or substantially all of the individuals and entities who were the beneficial owners, respectively, of the Outstanding Company Common Stock and Outstanding Company Voting Securities immediately prior to such Business Combination beneficially own, directly or indirectly, more than 85% of, respectively, the then outstanding Common Shares and the combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, as the case may be, of the corporation resulting from such Business Combination (including, without limitation, a corporation which as a result of such transaction owns the Company through one or more subsidiaries) in substantially the same proportions as their ownership, immediately prior to such Business Combination, of the Outstanding Company Common Stock and Outstanding Company Voting Securities, as the case may be, (B) no Person (excluding (1) any employee benefit plan (or related trust) of the Company or such corporation resulting from such Business Combination or (2) the Exempted Interests) beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, 15% or more of, respectively, the then outstanding shares of common stock of the corporation resulting from such Business Combination or the combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities of such corporation except to the extent that such ownership existed prior to the Business Combination and (C) at least a majority of the members of the board of directors of the corporation resulting from such Business Combination were members of the Incumbent Board at the time of the execution of the initial agreement, or of the action of the Board, providing for such Business Combination; or
(iv) The consummation of (A) a complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company or (B) the sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the COMPANY’S assets, other than to a corporation with respect to which, following such sale or other disposition, (1) more than 85% of, respectively, the then outstanding shares of common stock of such corporation and the combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities of such corporation entitled to vote generally in the election of directors is then beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by all or substantially all of the individuals and entities who were the beneficial owners, respectively, of the Outstanding Company Common Stock and Outstanding Company Voting Securities immediately prior to such sale or other disposition in substantially the same proportion as their ownership, immediately prior to such sale or other disposition, of the Outstanding Company Common Stock and Outstanding Company Voting Securities, as the case may be, (2) less than 15% of, respectively, the then outstanding shares of common stock of such corporation and the combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities of such corporation entitled to vote generally in the election of directors is then beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by any Person (excluding (x) any employee benefit plan (or related trust) of the Company or such corporation or (y) the Exempted Interests), except to the extent that such Person owned 15% or more of
A-8
the Outstanding Company Common Stock or Outstanding Company Voting Securities prior to the sale or disposition, and (3) at least a majority of the members of the board of directors of such corporation were members of the Incumbent Board at the time of the execution of the initial agreement, or of the action of the Board, providing for such sale or other disposition of assets of the Company or were elected, appointed or nominated by the Board.
(v) The change of control requirements identified in regulations implementing Section 409A(e)(2) of the Code will prevail over any conflicting provisions of 16.4(i) to (iv) for those nonqualified deferred compensation plans governed by Section 409A of the Code to the extent required to comply with, and to avoid any adverse tax consequences under, Section 409A of the Code.
16.5 “Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
16.6 “Committee” means the Compensation Committee of the Board, as described in Article 2.
16.7 “Common Share” means one share of the common stock of the Company.
16.8 “Company” means PACCAR Inc, a Delaware corporation.
16.9 “Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
16.10 “Exercise Price” means the amount for which one Common Share may be purchased upon exercise of an Option, as specified in the applicable Stock Option Agreement.
16.11 “Fair Market Value” shall mean the closing price of a Common Share on the trading day immediately preceding the day in question.
16.12 “ISO” means an incentive stock option described in Section 422(b) of the Code.
16.13 “Key Employee” means a key common law employee of the Company or of a Subsidiary, as determined by the Committee.
16.14 “NSO” means an employee stock option not described in sections 422 through 424 of the Code.
16.15 “Option” means an ISO or NSO granted under the Plan and entitling the holder to purchase one Common Share.
16.16 “Optionee” means an individual or estate who holds an Option.
16.17 “Participant” means an individual or estate who holds an Award.
16.18 “Plan” means this PACCAR Inc Long Term Incentive Plan, as it may be amended from time to time.
16.19 “Restricted Share” means a Common Share awarded under the Plan.
16.20 “SAR” means a stock appreciation right granted under the Plan.
16.21 “Stock Award Agreement” means the agreement between the Company and the recipient of a Restricted Share or Stock Unit which contains the terms, conditions, and restrictions pertaining to such Restricted Share or Stock Unit.
16.22 “Stock Option Agreement” means the agreement between the Company and an Optionee which contains the terms, conditions, and restrictions pertaining to his or her Option.
16.23 “Stock Unit” means a bookkeeping entry representing the equivalent of one Common Share awarded under the Plan.
16.24 “Subsidiary” means any company, if the Companyand/or one or more other Subsidiaries own not less than 50% of the total combined voting power of all classes of outstanding stock of such company. A company that attains the status of a Subsidiary on a date after the adoption of the Plan shall be considered a Subsidiary commencing as of such date.
A-9
Appendix B
PACCAR Inc
SENIOR EXECUTIVE YEARLY
INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN
1. PURPOSE
The Plan was approved by the Company’s stockholders in 1997, 2002 and 2006. The purpose of the Plan is to promote the success of the Company and the creation of shareholder value by (a) encouraging senior executives to focus maximum effort on achieving high-quality performance objectives, Company profitability, and continued Company growth, (b) encouraging the attraction and retention of senior executives with exceptional qualifications and (c) preserving for the Company the benefit of federal income tax deductions with respect to annual incentive compensation paid to senior executives.
2. ELIGIBILITY
The Company’s chief executive officer, the other covered employees within the meaning of Code Section 162(m)and such other senior executives as designated by the Committee shall be eligible to participate in the Plan.
3. ADMINISTRATION
The Plan shall be administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board. The Committee shall consist exclusively of three or more directors of the Company, who shall meet the independence requirements of NASDAQ and the Securities and Exchange Commission and be appointed by the Board. In addition, the composition of the Committee shall satisfy:
(a) Such requirements as the Securities and Exchange Commission may establish for administrators acting under plans intended to qualify for exemption underRule 16b-3 (or its successor) under the Exchange Act; and
(b) Such requirements as the Internal Revenue Service may establish for outside directors acting under a plan intended to qualify for exemption under Section 162(m)(4)(C) of the Code.
The Committee shall have the authority to interpret the Plan and make all other decisions relating to the operations of the Plan. The Committee may adopt such rules or guidelines as it deems appropriate to administer the Plan. The Committee’s determinations under the Plan shall be final and binding on all persons.
4. AWARD DETERMINATION
Incentive awards paid under the Plan will be based solely on the attainment of specified performance goals established by the Committee during the first 90 days of the Plan Year. Performance goals will be based on objective criteria specifically defined by the Committee on a Company, business unit or peer group comparison basis, which may include or exclude specified items of an unusual or non-recurring nature and are based on one or more of the following: net income, return on assets, return on net assets, return on sales, return on capital, return on equity, return on revenue, sales growth, market share, cash flow, cost reduction, total shareholder return, economic value added, cash flow return on investment and cash value added. Performance goals may include a minimum, maximum and target level of performance with the size of individual awards, if any, based on the level attained. Actual goal attainment will be certified in writing by the Committee before payout.
The Committee, in its sole discretion, may reduce or eliminate any award otherwise earned based on an assessment of individual performance, but in no event may any such reduction result in an increase of the award payable to any other participant. The Committee shall determine the amount of any such reduction by taking into account such factors as it deems relevant including, without limitation: (a) performance against other financial or strategic objectives; (b) its subjective assessment of the executive’s overall performance for
B-1
the year; and (c) prevailing levels of total compensation among similar companies. The maximum amount that may be paid to any eligible participant in any year under the Plan is $4,500,000.
5. CHANGE IN CONTROL
In the event of a Change in Control of the Company, each participant will be entitled to the maximum prorated award based on the number of full or partial months completed prior to the Change in Control during the Plan Year in which the Change in Control occurs.
6. TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT
Participants who retire, resign or are terminated before the end of the Plan Year are not eligible for an award for the Plan Year. In the event of death or disability, payout will be prorated based on actual goal achievement and salary received for the portion of the year worked.
7. EMPLOYMENT RIGHTS
Neither the Plan, nor the payment of an award, nor any other action taken pursuant to the Plan, shall constitute or be evidence of any agreement or understanding, express or implied, that the Company or a Subsidiary will employ any individual for any period of time, in any position or at any particular rate of compensation.
8. AMENDMENT OR TERMINATION OF THE PLAN
The Board of Directors may alter, amend or terminate the Plan at any time. An amendment of the Plan shall be subject to the approval of the Company’s stockholders only to the extent required by applicable laws, regulations or rules. No awards shall be granted under the Plan after the termination thereof.
9. EFFECTIVE DATE
The Plan shall be effective as of January 1, 2011 subject to its approval by the Company’s stockholders at the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
10. DEFINITIONS
(a) “Board” means the Board of Directors of the Company, as constituted from time to time.
(b) “Change in Control” for purposes of this Plan means any of the events described in Section 16.4 of the Long Term Incentive Plan.
(c) “Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
(d) “Committee” means the Compensation Committee of the Board.
(e) “Company” means PACCAR Inc, a Delaware corporation.
(f) “Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
(g) “Plan” means this amended and restated PACCAR Inc Senior Yearly Executive Incentive Compensation Plan, as it may be amended from time to time.
(h) “Plan Year” means a calendar year.
(i) “Subsidiary” means a company in which the Companyand/or one or more Subsidiaries of the Company own a majority of all classes of outstanding stock.
B-2
Directions to Meydenbauer Center
| | | |
Driving Directions | | | Parking |
• From I-405 northbound or southbound take Exit 13A west (NE 4th Street westbound).
• Turn right onto 112th Avenue NE (heading north).
• Turn left onto NE 6th Street and proceed into the Meydenbauer Center parking garage entrance on the right. | | | Due to limited parking availability and construction around Meydenbauer Center, you are encouraged to explore Metro Transit’s commuter services. The Bellevue Transit Center is located one block from Meydenbauer Center.
Please visitwww.meydenbauer.com for the latest information on parking availability in and around Meydenbauer Center. |
| | | |
Vehicles with two or more occupants may use the NE 6th Street HOV only off- and on-ramps. Cross 112th Avenue NE and turn right into the Meydenbauer Center parking garage. | | | |
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
Tuesday, April 20, 2010
10:30 a.m.
Meydenbauer Center
11100 N.E. 6th Street
Bellevue, Washington 98004
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder Meeting to be held on Tuesday, April 20, 2010 at 10:30 a.m. at Meydenbauer Center, Bellevue, Washington. The proxy statement and annual report to stockholders are available on the Company’s website atwww.paccar.com/2010annualmeeting/.
| | | | |
| | ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS Wednesday, April 20, 2011 10:30 a.m. Meydenbauer Center 11100 N.E. 6th Street Bellevue, Washington 98004 Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder Meeting to be held on Wednesday, April 20, 2011 at 10:30 a.m. at Meydenbauer Center, Bellevue, Washington. The proxy statement and annual report to stockholders are available on the Company’s website at www.paccar.com/2011annualmeeting/. 777 -— 106th Avenue N.E. Bellevue, WA 98004 | | 98004proxy This proxy |
|
|
This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors for use at the Annual Meeting on April 20, 2010.
The shares of common stock you hold of record on February 23, 2010, will be voted as you specify on the reverse side.
If the proxy is signed and no choice is specified, the proxy will be voted “FOR” Item 1 and “AGAINST” Items 2, 3 and 4. By signing the proxy, you revoke all prior proxies and appoint Mark C. Pigott, John M. Fluke, Jr., and each of them, with full power of substitution, to vote your shares on the matters shown on the reverse side and to vote in their discretion on any other matters which may properly come before the Annual Meeting and all adjournments.
Shares credited to the undersigned in the PACCAR Inc Savings Investment Plan (SIP) will be voted by the Trustee in accordance with the voting instructions indicated on the reverse. If no voting instructions are received, the Trustee will vote the shares in direct proportion to the shares with respect to which it has received timely voting instructions by Members, as provided in the SIP.
Shares held by the undersigned in the Employee Stock Purchase Plan will be voted by the Plan in accordance with the voting instructions indicated on the reverse.
See reverse for voting instructions.
Vote by Internet, Telephone or Mail
24 Hours a Day, 7 Days a Week
is solicited by the Board of Directors for use at the Annual Meeting on April 20, 2011. The shares of common stock you hold of record on February 23, 2011, will be voted as you specify on the reverse side. If the proxy is signed and no choice is specified, the proxy will be voted “FOR” Items 1, 2, 4 and 5; “THREE YEARS” on Item 3 and “AGAINST” Items 6 and 7. By signing the proxy, you revoke all prior proxies and appoint Mark C. Pigott, John M. Fluke, Jr., and each of them, with full power of substitution, to vote your shares on the matters shown on the reverse side and to vote in their discretion on any other matters which may properly come before the Annual Meeting and all adjournments. Shares credited to the undersigned in the PACCAR Inc Savings Investment Plan (SIP) will be voted by the Trustee in accordance with the voting instructions indicated on the reverse. If no voting instructions are received, the Trustee will vote the shares in direct proportion to the shares with respect to which it has received timely voting instructions by Members, as provided in the SIP. Shares held by the undersigned in the Employee Stock Purchase Plan will be voted by the Plan in accordance with the voting instructions indicated on the reverse. Vote by Internet, Telephone or Mail 24 Hours a Day, 7 Days a Week Your phone or Internet vote authorizes the named proxies to vote your shares in the same manner as if you marked, signed and returned your proxy card. INTERNET PHONE MAIL www.eproxy.com/pcar 1-800-560-1965 Mark, sign and date your proxy card.
| | |
: | | INTERNET– www.eproxy.com/pcar Use the Internet to vote your proxy Use a touch-tone telephone to card and return it in the until 12:00 p.m. (CT) on April 19, 2010. |
| | |
( | | PHONE – 1-800-560-1965
Use a touch-tone telephone to vote your proxy until 12:00 p.m. postage-paid envelope provided. April 19, 2011. (CT) on April 19, 2010.2011. If you vote your proxy by Internet or by Telephone, you do NOT need to mail back your Proxy Card. 110715 |
| | |
* | | MAIL–Shareowner ServicesSM P.O. Box 64945 St. Paul, MN 55164-0945 Address Change Mark box, sign, and date your proxy cardindicate changes below: COMPANY # TO VOTE BY INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, SEE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS PROXY CARD. TO VOTE BY MAIL AS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS ON ALL ITEMS BELOW, SIMPLY SIGN, DATE, AND RETURN THIS PROXY CARD. The Board of Directors Recommends a Vote “FOR” Items 1, 2, 4 and return it in5; a vote of “THREE YEARS” on Item 3 and “AGAINST” Items 6 and 7. The Board Recommends a vote FOR the postage-paid envelope provided. |
If you vote your proxy by Internet or by Telephone, you do NOT need to mail back the proxy card.
TO VOTE BY MAIL AS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS ON ALL ITEMS BELOW,
SIMPLY SIGN, DATE, AND RETURN THIS PROXY CARD.
òPlease detach hereò
The Board of Directors Recommends a Vote “FOR” Item 1 and “AGAINST” Items 2, 3 and 4.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1. Election of directors: | | 01 | | Alison J. Carnwath | | 03 | | John M. Pigott | | o | | Vote FOR | | o | | Vote WITHHELD |
| | 02 | | Robert T. Parry | | 04 | | Gregory M. E. Spierkel | | | | all nominees | | | | from all nominees |
| | | | | | | | | | | | (except as marked) | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
(Instructions:following proposal: 1. Election of directors: 01 John M. Fluke, Jr. 03 Stephen F. Page Vote FOR Vote WITHHELD 02 Kirk S. Hachigian 04 Thomas E. Plimpton all nominees from all nominees (except as marked) (Instructions: To withhold authority to vote for any indicated nominee, write the number(s) of the nominee(s) in the box provided to the right.) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The Board Recommends a vote FOR the following proposal: 2. | | Advisory vote on the compensation of the Named Executive Officers For Against Abstain The Board Recommends a vote of THREE YEARS on the following proposal: 3. Advisory vote on the frequency of executive compensation votes 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years Abstain The Board Recommends a vote FOR the following proposals: 4. Approval of the Long Term Incentive Plan For Against Abstain 5. Approval of the Senior Executive Yearly Incentive Compensation Plan For Against Abstain The Board Recommends a vote AGAINST the following proposals: 6. Stockholder proposal regarding the supermajority vote provisions | | | o | For | | o | Against | | o | Abstain | |
|
3.
| | 7. Stockholder proposal regarding a director vote threshold | | | o | For | | o | Against | | o | Abstain | |
|
4.
| | Stockholder proposal regarding composition of the compensation committee | | | o | For | | o | Against | | o | Abstain | THIS PROXY WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED OR, IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN, WILL BE VOTED FOR ITEMS 1, 2, 4 and 5, THREE YEARS on ITEM 3 AND AGAINST ITEMS 6 AND 7. Date ___________________________ Signature(s) in Box Please sign exactly as name(s) appears in type. If shares are held by joint owners, all persons should sign. When acting as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee, or guardian, please give full title as such. If a corporation, please sign full corporate name by president or other authorized officer. If a partnership, please sign partnership name by authorized person. |
THIS PROXY WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED OR, IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN, WILL BE VOTED FOR ITEM 1 AND AGAINST ITEMS 2, 3 AND 4.
| | | | |
Address Change? Mark Box o Indicate changes below:
| | Date | | |
| | | | |
Signature(s) in Box
Please sign exactly as name(s) appears in type. If shares are held by joint owners, all persons should sign. When acting as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee, or guardian, please give full title as such. If a corporation, please sign full corporate name by president or other authorized officer. If a partnership, please sign partnership name by authorized person.